From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH] x86: re-add stack alignment check
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 13:12:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161125131230.GC11640@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c5519e6-dacf-bb51-969a-500bc5095e2f@citrix.com>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:34:30AM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/11/16 10:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>> On 15.11.16 at 11:46, <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 15.11.16 at 11:26, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>> Everything will indeed break if it is off by 8, but everything will also
> >>> be similarly-broken if it is off by 16 or off by -8.
> >> Off by -8 will be caught as well. And there's no possible off-by-16,
> >> as then the calculations will be right again (read: you can freely
> >> add two longs to struct cpu_info, but you mustn't add just one).
> > This discussion appears to have stalled, and so far I've seen no
> > reason to change other than the position of the checks. I'm
> > hesitant to send out v2 though without having reached agreement
> > on the other aspects.
>
> Fine - lets get this fix back in for 4.8, then argue over how it should
> be improved.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-25 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-14 13:25 [PATCH] x86: re-add stack alignment check Jan Beulich
2016-11-14 13:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-14 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-14 14:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-14 14:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-14 15:02 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-14 16:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-14 16:54 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-15 10:26 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-15 10:46 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 10:14 ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2016-11-25 10:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-25 13:12 ` Wei Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161125131230.GC11640@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.