From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Matz Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mempool: remove a redundant word "for" in comment Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:25:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20161128142518.6ed7b6e0@platinum> References: <1480214627-27666-1-git-send-email-wei.zhao1@intel.com> <20161128094212.135ce16c@platinum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Wei Zhao Return-path: Received: from mail-wj0-f182.google.com (mail-wj0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25370201 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:25:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f182.google.com with SMTP id qp4so115879637wjc.3 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 05:25:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20161128094212.135ce16c@platinum> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Wei, On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:42:12 +0100 Olivier Matz wrote: > Hi Wenzhuo, First, sorry for the mistake in your name my previous mail. Please find below some other comments about the patch (on the form). > On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 10:43:47 +0800 > Wei Zhao wrote: > > > From: zhao wei > > > > There is a redundant repetition word "for" in commnet line of the commnet -> comment > > file rte_mempool.h after the definition of RTE_MEMPOOL_OPS_NAMESIZE. > > The word "for"appear twice in line 359 and 360.One of them is Missing space after '"for"' and after '360.' > > redundant, so delete it. > > > > Fixes: 449c49b93a6b (" mempool: support handler operations") We should have an empty line after the 'Fixes:' tag. The check-git-log.sh can help you to notice these errors. Also, it is important that no spaces are added in the title of the commit. You can get the exact line with: git log -1 --abbrev=12 --format='Fixes: %h (\"%s\")' > > Signed-off-by: zhao wei The name in your .gitconfig should be the same than in you mail: Wei Zhao > > Acked-by: John McNamara > > Acked-by: Olivier Matz > Please, could you also check the same comments in the other patch? Last thing: when doing another version of the patch, you should add a changelog that describes what was modified. They take place after the 3 dashes. Thank you for contributing. Regards, Olivier