All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>
Subject: [patch] Documentation/process/howto: Only send regression fixes after -rc1
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:43:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161128144315.GA15885@mwanda> (raw)

The original text was not clear if white space or other harmless patches
should be merged in -rc kernels.  The discussion at Kernel Summit said
that we should be more strict about sending regression fixes only.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/Documentation/process/howto.rst b/Documentation/process/howto.rst
index 449ca1f1..1260f60 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/howto.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/howto.rst
@@ -267,15 +267,16 @@ process is as follows:
     is using git (the kernel's source management tool, more information
     can be found at https://git-scm.com/) but plain patches are also just
     fine.
-  - After two weeks a -rc1 kernel is released it is now possible to push
-    only patches that do not include new features that could affect the
-    stability of the whole kernel.  Please note that a whole new driver
-    (or filesystem) might be accepted after -rc1 because there is no
-    risk of causing regressions with such a change as long as the change
-    is self-contained and does not affect areas outside of the code that
-    is being added.  git can be used to send patches to Linus after -rc1
-    is released, but the patches need to also be sent to a public
-    mailing list for review.
+  - After two weeks a -rc1 kernel is released and the focus is on making the
+    new kernel as rock solid as possible.  Most of the patches at this point
+    should fix a regression.  Bugs that have always existed are not
+    regressions, so only push these kinds of fixes if they are important.
+    Please note that a whole new driver (or filesystem) might be accepted
+    after -rc1 because there is no risk of causing regressions with such a
+    change as long as the change is self-contained and does not affect areas
+    outside of the code that is being added.  git can be used to send
+    patches to Linus after -rc1 is released, but the patches need to also be
+    sent to a public mailing list for review.
   - A new -rc is released whenever Linus deems the current git tree to
     be in a reasonably sane state adequate for testing.  The goal is to
     release a new -rc kernel every week.

             reply	other threads:[~2016-11-28 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-28 14:43 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2016-11-28 15:45 ` [patch] Documentation/process/howto: Only send regression fixes after -rc1 Greg KH
2016-11-29  0:25 ` Jonathan Corbet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161128144315.GA15885@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.