From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hch@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix a NULL dereference crash while accessing bdev->bd_disk
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:30:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161129093035.GC7550@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161128155718.GB7806@htj.duckdns.org>
On Mon 28-11-16 10:57:18, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jan.
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:07:18AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > As I'm looking into the code, we need a serialization between bdev writeback
> > and blkdev_put(). That should be doable if we use writeback_single_inode()
> > for writing bdev inode instead of simple filemap_fdatawrite() and then use
> > inode_wait_for_writeback() in blkdev_put() but it needs some careful
> > thought.
>
> It's kinda weird that sync() is ends up accessing bdev's without any
> synchronization. Can't we just make iterate_bdevs() grab bd_mutex and
> verify bd_disk isn't NULL before calling into the callback?
This reminded me I've already seen something like this and indeed I've
already had a very similar discussion in March -
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8556941/
Holding bd_mutex in iterate_devs() works but still nothing protects from
flusher thread just walking across the block device inode and trying to
write it which would result in the very same oops.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-26 2:06 [PATCH] mm: Fix a NULL dereference crash while accessing bdev->bd_disk Wei Fang
2016-11-26 2:06 ` Wei Fang
2016-11-28 10:07 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-28 15:57 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29 9:30 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-11-29 16:43 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-30 9:50 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-29 1:58 ` Wei Fang
2016-11-29 1:58 ` Wei Fang
2016-11-30 9:51 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-30 9:51 ` Jan Kara
2016-12-01 2:30 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-01 2:30 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-01 8:18 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-29 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2016-11-29 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2016-11-30 7:30 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161129093035.GC7550@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.