From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.8 v2] hbitmap: Fix shifts of constants by granularity
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:49:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161129094952.GD15786@lemon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115224732.1334-1-mreitz@redhat.com>
On Tue, 11/15 23:47, Max Reitz wrote:
> An hbitmap's granularity may be anything from 0 to 63, so when shifting
> constants by its value, they should not be plain ints.
>
> Even having changed the types, hbitmap_serialization_granularity() still
> tries to shift 64 to the right by the granularity. This operation is
> undefined if the granularity is greater than 57. Adding an assertion is
> fine for now, because serializing is done only in tests so far, but this
> means that only bitmaps with a granularity below 58 can be serialized
> and we should thus add a hbitmap_is_serializable() function later.
>
> One of the two places touched in this patch uses
> QEMU_ALIGN_UP(x, 1 << y). We can use ROUND_UP() there, since the second
> parameter is obviously a power of two.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Fix the same issue in hbitmap_truncate() [Stefan]
> - Use ROUND_UP() instead of QEMU_ALIGN_UP() there (because we can)
> - Add an assertion to hbitmap_serialization_granularity() guaranteeing
> that the shift doesn't overflow; we can guarantee this so far because
> the only place where serialization functions are used in is the
> hbitmap test
> (I'll send a follow-up patch to allow users to check whether a certain
> bitmap can be (de-)serialized)
Thanks, queued.
I'll send a pull request soon.
Fam
> ---
> util/hbitmap.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/util/hbitmap.c b/util/hbitmap.c
> index 5d1a21c..9f691b7 100644
> --- a/util/hbitmap.c
> +++ b/util/hbitmap.c
> @@ -399,9 +399,13 @@ bool hbitmap_get(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t item)
>
> uint64_t hbitmap_serialization_granularity(const HBitmap *hb)
> {
> + /* Must hold true so that the shift below is defined
> + * (ld(64) == 6, i.e. 1 << 6 == 64) */
> + assert(hb->granularity < 64 - 6);
> +
> /* Require at least 64 bit granularity to be safe on both 64 bit and 32 bit
> * hosts. */
> - return 64 << hb->granularity;
> + return UINT64_C(64) << hb->granularity;
> }
>
> /* Start should be aligned to serialization granularity, chunk size should be
> @@ -594,7 +598,7 @@ void hbitmap_truncate(HBitmap *hb, uint64_t size)
> if (shrink) {
> /* Don't clear partial granularity groups;
> * start at the first full one. */
> - uint64_t start = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(num_elements, 1 << hb->granularity);
> + uint64_t start = ROUND_UP(num_elements, UINT64_C(1) << hb->granularity);
> uint64_t fix_count = (hb->size << hb->granularity) - start;
>
> assert(fix_count);
> --
> 2.10.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-15 22:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.8 v2] hbitmap: Fix shifts of constants by granularity Max Reitz
2016-11-17 10:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-29 9:49 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161129094952.GD15786@lemon \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.