From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
"dvyukov@google.com" <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __unwind_start
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 07:10:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161129151004.GU3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161129124323.GJ3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:43:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:52:41PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> > Did a little digging on git blame and found the following commit (which
> > seems to be the cause of the KASAN warning and missing stack dump):
> >
> > bc1dce514e9b ("rcu: Don't use NMIs to dump other CPUs' stacks")
> >
> > I presume this commit is still needed because of the NMI printk deadlock
> > issues which were discussed at Kernel Summit. I guess those issues need
> > to be sorted out before the above commit can be reverted.
>
> Also, I most always run with these here patches applied:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161018170830.405990950@infradead.org
>
> People are very busy polishing the turd we call printk, but from where
> I'm sitting its terminally and unfixably broken.
>
> I should certainly add a revert of the above commit to the stack of
> patches I carry.
This isn't making me feel particularly confident about switching RCU
CPU stall warnings back to NMIs... ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-24 17:33 perf: fuzzer BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __unwind_start Vince Weaver
2016-11-28 21:54 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-11-29 0:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 5:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-11-29 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 14:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 15:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-11-29 16:12 ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-29 18:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 16:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 17:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-11-29 17:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-30 9:29 ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-29 10:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 15:10 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2016-11-29 16:29 ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-29 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 19:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 19:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 20:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 20:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-30 19:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-11-30 19:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-12-01 5:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-01 12:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-12-01 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-01 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-30 10:01 ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-30 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161129151004.GU3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.