From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: DSA vs. SWTICHDEV ?
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:09:27 +0100
Message-ID: <20161130180927.GK21645@lunn.ch>
References: <1480495831.3563.135.camel@infinera.com>
 <20161130135257.GC18716@lunn.ch>
 <1480516241.3563.142.camel@infinera.com>
 <20161130152503.GE21645@lunn.ch>
 <1480523716.3563.144.camel@infinera.com>
 <20161130165500.GH21645@lunn.ch>
 <1480527852.3563.146.camel@infinera.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:35355 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753106AbcK3SJb (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:09:31 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1480527852.3563.146.camel@infinera.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

> Something like that. I need to run routing protocols on the switch I/Fs and egress
> pkgs on selected switch I/Fs bypassing ARP, just like DSA does with its vendor
> tags.

Does the switch have an equivalent tagging protocol? If you are
building a tree of switches you need something like this for frames
going from the host via intermediate switches and out a specific port
on a remote switch.

> We might have a tree as well so now I really wonder: Given we write a
> proper switchdev driver, can it support switchtrees without touching
> switchdev infra structure?

Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> is probably the best person to ask about
this. DSA hides the knowledge that there is multiple switches. To
switchdev, a tree of switches looks like one switch. This is not
because of switchdev, it is just the existing DSA code worked when
switchdev came along.

 If not I guess we will attach a physical
> eth I/F to the switch and use both DSA and switchdev to support both trees
> and HW offload. 

This only works if the switch has the necessary tagging protocol to
pass through multiple switches.

> We have on an existing board with a BCM ROBO switch with lots of ports(>24),
> managed over SPI. Looking at BCM DSA tag code it looks like it only supports
> some 8 ports or so. I still have to find out if this is a limitation in BCM tagging
> protocol or if just not impl. in DSA yet.

Hi Florian, care to comment?

As far as i understand, the tag used for SF2 and B53 does not support
a tree of switches. But the big ROBO switches might have a different
tagging protocol.

  Andrew