From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:56:39 -0800 From: Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: remoteproc/ste: Hide config option by default Message-ID: <20161202215639.GE9322@tuxbot> References: <20161201094955.4c4eefe3@endymion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: To: Linus Walleij Cc: Jean Delvare , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, Ohad Ben-Cohen , Dmitry Tarnyagin , Suman Anna List-ID: On Fri 02 Dec 02:08 PST 2016, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Back in July 2014 I asked around what was the intended target > > platform for the STE Modem remoteproc driver, so that I could add the > > proper hardware dependency to its config option. The answer I got was > > that there was no known publicly available hardware needing it and it > > was unlikely that there ever would. > > > > Still there were objections to deleting the driver, which I do not > > really understand, but I do respect. But as there is no point in > > presenting the config option by default, let's hide it unless > > build-testing. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > > Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson > > Cc: Linus Walleij > > Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin > > Cc: Suman Anna > > --- > > As suggested by Linus Walleij over 2 years ago, sorry for not > > following up back then: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/25/218 > > > > The driver could also be moved to staging/. > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > Also for moving it to staging, if you want. Or deleting it. > If there's no known present or future users of this code I would prefer that we just drop it - it will stay with us in the git history if someone wants it back. I do not want to see it moved to staging, I still need to maintain it when the internal remoteproc APIs changes. Regards, Bjorn