From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh at linuxfoundation.org Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 09:55:50 +0100 Subject: [lustre-devel] Remaining work needed for moving Lustre out of staging In-Reply-To: <1E1B324A-F545-417D-9C35-550FA58665C7@intel.com> References: <1E1B324A-F545-417D-9C35-550FA58665C7@intel.com> Message-ID: <20161203085550.GA5375@kroah.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Dilger, Andreas" Cc: "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org" , "jsimmons@infradead.org" , "Drokin, Oleg" On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:53:08PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote: > Al, > Greg recently raised the issue of what still needs to be done to > move the Lustre code out of staging/ and into the fs/ tree. > > James has been doing a great job of cleaning up various checkpatch > issues and keeping the code updated with the latest fixes, but we > were wondering what you were aware of that needed to be cleaned > up in Lustre? Is the whole "mixing kernel structures in userspace structures" all resolved now? For some reason I thought that you had kernel locks being passed to userspace and then back into the kernel, but it's been a long time since I last looked... If you feel you are ready for a "real" review, I'll be glad to go over the code before the vfs people look at it, just let me know. No need to bother them if you still have basic things wrong that I can find... thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37904 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751743AbcLCIzm (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2016 03:55:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 09:55:50 +0100 From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" To: "Dilger, Andreas" Cc: "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org" , "jsimmons@infradead.org" , "Drokin, Oleg" Subject: Re: Remaining work needed for moving Lustre out of staging Message-ID: <20161203085550.GA5375@kroah.com> References: <1E1B324A-F545-417D-9C35-550FA58665C7@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1E1B324A-F545-417D-9C35-550FA58665C7@intel.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:53:08PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote: > Al, > Greg recently raised the issue of what still needs to be done to > move the Lustre code out of staging/ and into the fs/ tree. > > James has been doing a great job of cleaning up various checkpatch > issues and keeping the code updated with the latest fixes, but we > were wondering what you were aware of that needed to be cleaned > up in Lustre? Is the whole "mixing kernel structures in userspace structures" all resolved now? For some reason I thought that you had kernel locks being passed to userspace and then back into the kernel, but it's been a long time since I last looked... If you feel you are ready for a "real" review, I'll be glad to go over the code before the vfs people look at it, just let me know. No need to bother them if you still have basic things wrong that I can find... thanks, greg k-h