Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 0/2] Remove need for -iscsi argument

["Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:12:04PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.12.2016 um 13:41 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > This small series removes the need for using the -iscsi argument
> > by directly supporting all the -iscsi options against the block
> > device config eg instead of
> > 
> > $QEMU \
> >   -object secret,id=sec0,data=123456 \
> >   -drive driver=iscsi,file=iscsi://catbus/iqn.fedora:kvm/2 \
> >   -iscsi initiator-name=fish,user=test,password-secret=sec0,timeout=234 
> > 
> > you can now do it all against -drive
> > 
> > $QEMU \
> >   -object secret,id=sec0,data=123456 \
> >   -drive driver=iscsi,file=iscsi://catbus/iqn.fedora:kvm/2,\
> >          initiator-name=fish,user=test,password-secret=sec0,timeout=234 
> > 
> > This fixes the problem that you cannot associate -drive instances
> > with -iscsi args reliably due to IQNs containing chracters that
> > QEMU forbids in QemuOpts ID strings.
> > 
> > Pino had previously sent a patch to do this for initiator-name
> > back in the 2.6 dev cycle
> > 
> >   https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2016-04/msg00246.html
> > 
> > This series supports all the -iscsi option names, except for
> > 'password' which is intentionally left out as it is insecure
> > and replaced by 'password-secret'.
> 
> I actually do the same as part of my iscsi for blockdev-add series,
> which I guess I better should have sent as an RFC even if it's yet
> untested to save you the work...
> 
> As I do more on top of just converting -iscsi, I would prefer using my
> patches even if you posted yours first.

I don't mind, as long as this gets done for 2.9 and doesn't slip for
yet another release.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-    http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|