From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 23:46:27 +0000 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v4 00/11] ocfs2: wire up {clone, copy, dedupe}_range In-Reply-To: <20161210234325.GJ1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <148140257493.24628.6724911560073347399.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20161210234325.GJ1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20161210234627.GA15943@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: mfasheh@versity.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:43:25PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:42:55PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is the fourth submission of a series of patches that wire up the > > existing ocfs2 reflinking capabilities to the new(ish) VFS > > {copy,clone,dedupe}_range interface. The first few patches hoist some > > of the reflink/dedupe prep functions into the VFS since the code is > > common to XFS and ocfs2. Then there are fixes for some ocfs2 bugs that > > I found; and finally the last kernel patch contains the new code. > > > > A few minor fixes to xfstests are needed to make more of the tests run; > > those have been sent separately to the fstests lists. Some of the > > xfstests will fail because ocfs2's design does not allow sharing of > > blocks between disjoint sets of files with shared blocks. That is to > > say, if A shares with B and C shares with D, B and C cannot be made to > > share blocks. > > Merged, will be in tonight's push. ... of #for-next, that is - not to Linus ;-) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:48202 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752184AbcLJXqa (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Dec 2016 18:46:30 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 23:46:27 +0000 From: Al Viro To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: mfasheh@versity.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] ocfs2: wire up {clone,copy,dedupe}_range Message-ID: <20161210234627.GA15943@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <148140257493.24628.6724911560073347399.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20161210234325.GJ1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161210234325.GJ1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:43:25PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:42:55PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is the fourth submission of a series of patches that wire up the > > existing ocfs2 reflinking capabilities to the new(ish) VFS > > {copy,clone,dedupe}_range interface. The first few patches hoist some > > of the reflink/dedupe prep functions into the VFS since the code is > > common to XFS and ocfs2. Then there are fixes for some ocfs2 bugs that > > I found; and finally the last kernel patch contains the new code. > > > > A few minor fixes to xfstests are needed to make more of the tests run; > > those have been sent separately to the fstests lists. Some of the > > xfstests will fail because ocfs2's design does not allow sharing of > > blocks between disjoint sets of files with shared blocks. That is to > > say, if A shares with B and C shares with D, B and C cannot be made to > > share blocks. > > Merged, will be in tonight's push. ... of #for-next, that is - not to Linus ;-)