All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: EunTaik Lee <eun.taik.lee@samsung.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/pid fix use-after free in task_tgid_vnr
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:03:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161213160340.GA4653@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bmwhdkv1.fsf@xmission.com>

On 12/13, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > In this case current->group_leader or parent/real_parent can point to the
> > exited/freed tasks. I already said this many times, ee really need to nullify
> > them in __unhash_process() but this needs a lot of (mostly simple)
> > cleanups.
>
> Is there anything wrong with starting with the patch below?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index 9d68c45ebbe3..03daeecc335d 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
>                 if (zap_leader)
>                         leader->exit_state = EXIT_DEAD;
>         }
> +       p->group_leader = NULL;

Yes, see above, this is what we should do. Except I think we should
change __unhash_process() to do this. The same for parent/real_parent.

> That seems to cut to the heart of the matter.

Exactly.

But we can not start with this change. Just for example,
task_session/task_pgrp/tgid can obviously crash, even if used properly,
they will need to check group_leader != NULL. __task_pid_nr_ns() should
be changed too. And more.

That is why I'd prefer to start with the simple fix I suggested before,
then do the cleanups.

And imo that change makes sense in any case to avoid the code duplication,
even if we change __unhash_process() to nullify group_leader/etc. Note that
we can also add __PIDTYPE_PPID and turn task_ppid_nr_ns() into another
trivial users of  __task_pid_nr_ns(). Just it will need to check task != NULL
instead if pid_alive(p).

So, will you agree with v2 below? s/PIDTYPE_TGID/__PIDTYPE_TGID/ as you
suggested, and move task_tgid_nr_ns() into sched.h close to other similar
helpers.

Oleg.


--- a/include/linux/pid.h
+++ b/include/linux/pid.h
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ enum pid_type
 	PIDTYPE_PID,
 	PIDTYPE_PGID,
 	PIDTYPE_SID,
-	PIDTYPE_MAX
+	PIDTYPE_MAX,
+	/* only valid to __task_pid_nr_ns() */
+	__PIDTYPE_TGID
 };
 
 /*
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2117,14 +2117,6 @@ static inline pid_t task_tgid_nr(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	return tsk->tgid;
 }
 
-pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns);
-
-static inline pid_t task_tgid_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	return pid_vnr(task_tgid(tsk));
-}
-
-
 static inline int pid_alive(const struct task_struct *p);
 static inline pid_t task_ppid_nr_ns(const struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
 {
@@ -2166,6 +2158,16 @@ static inline pid_t task_session_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_SID, NULL);
 }
 
+static inline pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
+{
+	return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, __PIDTYPE_TGID, ns);
+}
+
+static inline pid_t task_tgid_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, __PIDTYPE_TGID, NULL);
+}
+
 /* obsolete, do not use */
 static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -526,8 +526,11 @@ pid_t __task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type,
 	if (!ns)
 		ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
 	if (likely(pid_alive(task))) {
-		if (type != PIDTYPE_PID)
+		if (type != PIDTYPE_PID) {
+			if (type == __PIDTYPE_TGID)
+				type = PIDTYPE_PID;
 			task = task->group_leader;
+		}
 		nr = pid_nr_ns(rcu_dereference(task->pids[type].pid), ns);
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -536,12 +539,6 @@ pid_t __task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__task_pid_nr_ns);
 
-pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
-{
-	return pid_nr_ns(task_tgid(tsk), ns);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_tgid_nr_ns);
-
 struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	return ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk));

      reply	other threads:[~2016-12-13 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20161209093351epcms1p418673c3cdec7d4c3e81b5df131173c57@epcms1p4>
2016-12-09  9:33 ` [PATCH] sched/pid fix use-after free in task_tgid_vnr EunTaik Lee
2016-12-09 17:21   ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-12-09 22:21     ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-12-12 13:46       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-12-12 19:10         ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-12-13 16:03           ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161213160340.GA4653@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eun.taik.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.