All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch NOT added to 3.12 stable tree] Don't feed anything but regular iovec's to blk_rq_map_user_iov
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:54:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161215015412.GQ1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyO-bZo24dT7m8PU8+vxsLEWDZzKrJyP=Tm7RAT=cCd0Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:09:25AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > I really doubt it - there might be something subtle I'd missed, but AFAICS
> > it is vulnerable to the scenario above.
> 
> Hmm. So maybe just add
> 
>         if (segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))
>                 return -EINVAL;
> 
> to blk_rq_map_user_iov()?

To sg_write(), actually.  And we need it both in old branches and in
the mainline - sg_new_write() problem applies in mainline as well, and
if nothing else, it allows to perform reads from arbitrary kernel
space address; I'm not sure how easy it is to see the value it has
fetched, but it certainly can do unpleasant things to memory-mapped
IO registers.

As the matter of fact, bsg_write() is no better - blk_fill_sgv4_hdr_rq()
is called before we get to blk_rq_map_user() where your test would make
it fail, and it does
        if (copy_from_user(rq->cmd, (void __user *)(unsigned long)hdr->request,
                           hdr->request_len))   
                return -EFAULT;
with *hdr, including hrd->request, has come from the data fed to bsg_write().

So I think we should make both sg_write() and bsg_write() to fail as early
as possible when called with KERNEL_DS, mainline and all -stable branches.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-15  1:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-12 15:07 [patch NOT added to 3.12 stable tree] Don't feed anything but regular iovec's to blk_rq_map_user_iov Jiri Slaby
2016-12-12 22:49 ` Greg KH
2016-12-13 14:40   ` Jiri Slaby
2016-12-13 15:24     ` Greg KH
2016-12-13 15:32       ` Jiri Slaby
2016-12-13 16:46         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-13 17:05           ` Al Viro
2016-12-13 17:09             ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-13 17:12               ` Jiri Slaby
2016-12-13 17:42                 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-15  1:54               ` Al Viro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161215015412.GQ1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.