From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>,
bh74.an@samsung.com, ks.giri@samsung.com,
vipul.pandya@samsung.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com,
alexandre.torgue@st.com, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: ethernet: sxgbe: remove private tx queue lock
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:02:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161219100215.GA6296@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161218001507.GA5343@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2119 bytes --]
Hi!
> Lino, have you considered via-rhine.c since its "move work from irq to
> workqueue context" changes that started in
> 7ab87ff4c770eed71e3777936299292739fcd0fe [*] ?
>
> It's a shameless plug - originated in r8169.c - but it should be rather
> close to what the sxgbe and friends require. Thought / opinion ?
>
> [*] Including fixes/changes in:
> - 3a5a883a8a663b930908cae4abe5ec913b9b2fd2
> - e1efa87241272104d6a12c8b9fcdc4f62634d447
> - 810f19bcb862f8889b27e0c9d9eceac9593925dd
> - e45af497950a89459a0c4b13ffd91e1729fffef4
> - a926592f5e4e900f3fa903298c4619a131e60963
> - 559bcac35facfed49ab4f408e162971612dcfdf3
Considering the memory barriers... is something like this neccessary
in the via-rhine?
AFAICT... we need a barrier after making sure that descriptor is no
longer owned by DMA (to make sure we don't get stale data in rest of
descriptor)... and we need a barrier before giving the descriptor to
the dma, to make sure DMA engine sees the complete update....?
Thanks,
Pavel
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c
index ba5c542..3806e72 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c
@@ -1952,6 +1952,7 @@ static void rhine_tx(struct net_device *dev)
entry, txstatus);
if (txstatus & DescOwn)
break;
+ dma_rmb();
skb = rp->tx_skbuff[entry];
if (txstatus & 0x8000) {
netif_dbg(rp, tx_done, dev,
@@ -2061,6 +2062,7 @@ static int rhine_rx(struct net_device *dev, int limit)
if (desc_status & DescOwn)
break;
+ dma_rmb();
netif_dbg(rp, rx_status, dev, "%s() status %08x\n", __func__,
desc_status);
@@ -2146,6 +2148,7 @@ static int rhine_rx(struct net_device *dev, int limit)
u64_stats_update_end(&rp->rx_stats.syncp);
}
give_descriptor_to_nic:
+ dma_wmb();
desc->rx_status = cpu_to_le32(DescOwn);
entry = (++rp->cur_rx) % RX_RING_SIZE;
}
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-19 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-07 20:05 Remove private locks to avoid possible deadlock Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-07 20:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: ethernet: sxgbe: remove private tx queue lock Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-07 23:15 ` Francois Romieu
2016-12-08 20:32 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-08 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-08 22:12 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-08 22:18 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-08 22:45 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-08 23:19 ` Francois Romieu
2016-12-09 11:21 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-10 2:25 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-11 20:11 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-15 19:27 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-15 21:03 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-15 21:32 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-15 22:33 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-17 17:31 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-18 0:15 ` Francois Romieu
2016-12-18 16:15 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-18 17:23 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-18 18:30 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-19 22:49 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-18 20:16 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-19 10:02 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2016-12-20 0:05 ` Francois Romieu
2016-12-07 20:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: ethernet: stmmac: " Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-07 20:55 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-07 20:59 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-07 21:37 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-07 21:43 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-07 22:34 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-07 23:21 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-07 23:41 ` David Miller
2016-12-08 14:08 ` Pavel Machek
2016-12-08 15:26 ` David Miller
2016-12-08 15:46 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161219100215.GA6296@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=bh74.an@samsung.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ks.giri@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=vipul.pandya@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.