From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" Subject: Re: Inlined functions in perf report Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:01:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20161220170108.GA6467@sesse.net> References: <20161220115954.GA35897@sesse.net> <20161220121755.GL3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <2027151.EnbG4A8ymx@milian-kdab2> <20161220135450.GA32756@kernel.org> <20161220140822.GA10075@sesse.net> <20161220143746.GD32756@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161220143746.GD32756@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Milian Wolff , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , "Liang, Kan" , "Jin, Yao" List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:37:46AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> Woot. Is this available in git somewhere? (Or if not, what do I apply it on >> top of?) > Normally you get it from tip, i.e. from: > > git//git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git perf/core I suppose perf/core here means a branch named perf/core in that git repository, but it doesn't seem to contain the patches in question. I tried applying them on top of that branch by wget-ing down the right messages from marc.info, but somehow, I must have misapplied them (it was rather painful, especially since they seemingly come out-of-order in the archives), because the resulting tree didn't compile. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/