From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Gstir <david@sigma-star.at>,
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] generic: test for weaknesses in filesystem encryption
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:36:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161221213601.GB136777@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161219072628.GC1859@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 03:26:28PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
>
> Can you please send an updated patch 6/6? Otherwise the whole series
> look good to me! I'm going to let the patchset sit in the list for
> another week and push them out to upstream in next fstests update, if
> there's no further comments from others.
>
> Thanks,
> Eryu
I just changed patch 6/6 but I went ahead and sent out v5 of the series so that
people don't mix up the different patches.
+Cc linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Also, would it be possible to get the xfs_io patch merged into xfsprogs at about
the same time? Ultimately, both the xfstests and xfsprogs changes are needed to
run the new tests; without the xfsprogs change they'll all be skipped.
Thanks,
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-21 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-15 20:26 [PATCH v4 0/6] Add filesystem-level encryption tests Eric Biggers
2016-12-15 20:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] generic: add utilities for testing filesystem encryption Eric Biggers
2016-12-15 20:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] generic: test setting and getting encryption policies Eric Biggers
2016-12-15 20:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] generic: test validation of encryption policy structure Eric Biggers
2016-12-15 20:26 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] generic: test encrypted file access Eric Biggers
2016-12-15 20:26 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] generic: test enforcement of one encryption policy per tree Eric Biggers
2016-12-15 20:26 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] generic: test for weaknesses in filesystem encryption Eric Biggers
2016-12-19 7:26 ` Eryu Guan
2016-12-21 21:36 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161221213601.GB136777@gmail.com \
--to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=david@sigma-star.at \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.