All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] perf sched timehist: Fix invalid period calculation
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 23:12:52 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161223021252.11225-5-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161223021252.11225-1-acme@kernel.org>

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

When --time option is given with a value outside recorded time, the last
sample time (tprev) was set to that value and run time calculation might
be incorrect.  This is a problem of the first samples for each cpus
since it would skip the runtime update when tprev is 0.  But with --time
option it had non-zero (which is invalid) value so the calculation is
also incorrect.

For example, let's see the followging:

  $ perf sched timehist
             time    cpu  task name                       wait time  sch delay   run time
                          [tid/pid]                          (msec)     (msec)     (msec)
  --------------- ------  ------------------------------  ---------  ---------  ---------
      3195.968367 [0003]  <idle>                              0.000      0.000      0.000
      3195.968386 [0002]  Timer[4306/4277]                    0.000      0.000      0.018
      3195.968397 [0002]  Web Content[4277]                   0.000      0.000      0.000
      3195.968595 [0001]  JS Helper[4302/4277]                0.000      0.000      0.000
      3195.969217 [0000]  <idle>                              0.000      0.000      0.621
      3195.969251 [0001]  kworker/1:1H[291]                   0.000      0.000      0.033

The sample starts at 3195.968367 but when I gave a time interval from
3194 to 3196 (in sec) it will calculate the whole 2 second as runtime.
In below, 2 cpus accounted it as runtime, other 2 cpus accounted it as
idle time.

Before:

  $ perf sched timehist --time 3194,3196 -s | tail
  Idle stats:
      CPU  0 idle for   1995.991  msec
      CPU  1 idle for     20.793  msec
      CPU  2 idle for     30.191  msec
      CPU  3 idle for   1999.852  msec

      Total number of unique tasks: 23
  Total number of context switches: 128
             Total run time (msec): 3724.940

After:

  $ perf sched timehist --time 3194,3196 -s | tail
  Idle stats:
      CPU  0 idle for     10.811  msec
      CPU  1 idle for     20.793  msec
      CPU  2 idle for     30.191  msec
      CPU  3 idle for     18.337  msec

      Total number of unique tasks: 23
  Total number of context switches: 128
             Total run time (msec): 18.139

Committer notes:

Further testing:

Before:

  Idle stats:
      CPU  0 idle for    229.785  msec
      CPU  1 idle for    937.944  msec
      CPU  2 idle for    188.931  msec
      CPU  3 idle for    986.185  msec

  After:

  # perf sched timehist --time 40602,40603 -s | tail

  Idle stats:
      CPU  0 idle for    229.785  msec
      CPU  1 idle for    175.407  msec
      CPU  2 idle for    188.931  msec
      CPU  3 idle for    223.657  msec

      Total number of unique tasks: 68
  Total number of context switches: 814
             Total run time (msec): 97.688

  # for cpu in `seq 0 3` ; do echo -n "CPU $cpu idle for " ; perf sched timehist --time 40602,40603 | grep "\[000${cpu}\].*\<idle\>" | tr -s ' ' | cut -d' ' -f7 | awk '{entries++ ; s+=$1} END {print s " msec (entries: " entries ")"}' ; done
  CPU 0 idle for 229.721 msec (entries: 123)
  CPU 1 idle for 175.381 msec (entries: 65)
  CPU 2 idle for 188.903 msec (entries: 56)
  CPU 3 idle for 223.61 msec (entries: 102)

Difference due to the idle stats being accounted at nanoseconds precision while
the <idle> entries in 'perf sched timehist' are trucated at msec.usec.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Fixes: 853b74071110 ("perf sched timehist: Add option to specify time window of interest")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161222060350.17655-2-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
index 5052caa91caa..d53e706a6f17 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
@@ -2405,7 +2405,7 @@ static int timehist_sched_change_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
 	if (ptime->start && ptime->start > t)
 		goto out;
 
-	if (ptime->start > tprev)
+	if (tprev && ptime->start > tprev)
 		tprev = ptime->start;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-23  2:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-23  2:12 [GIT PULL 0/4] perf/urgent fixes for 'perf sched timehist' and samples/bpf/ testing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-12-23  2:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf sched timehist: Honour 'comm_width' when aligning the headers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-12-23  2:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf sched timehist: Enlarge default 'comm_width' Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-12-23  2:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf sched timehist: Remove hardcoded 'comm_width' check at print_summary Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-12-23  2:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2016-12-23 14:54 ` [GIT PULL 0/4] perf/urgent fixes for 'perf sched timehist' and samples/bpf/ testing Namhyung Kim
2016-12-23 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161223021252.11225-5-acme@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.