All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fdmanana@suse.com, dsterba@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: Fix deadlock between direct IO and fast fsync
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:18:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161224001800.GA11160@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2606394.PBVynvYKAF@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 05:27:55PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 03:57:40 PM Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > On Friday, December 23, 2016 03:00:18 PM Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > > The following deadlock is seen when executing generic/113 test,
> > > 
> > >  ---------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------
> > >   Direct I/O task                                           Fast fsync task
> > >  ---------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------
> > >   btrfs_direct_IO
> > >     __blockdev_direct_IO
> > >      do_blockdev_direct_IO
> > >       do_direct_IO
> > >        btrfs_get_blocks_direct
> > >         while (blocks needs to written)
> > >          get_more_blocks (first iteration)
> > >           btrfs_get_blocks_direct
> > >            btrfs_create_dio_extent
> > >              down_read(&BTRFS_I(inode) >dio_sem)
> > >              Create and add extent map and ordered extent
> > >              up_read(&BTRFS_I(inode) >dio_sem)
> > >                                                             btrfs_sync_file
> > >                                                               btrfs_log_dentry_safe
> > >                                                                btrfs_log_inode_parent
> > >                                                                 btrfs_log_inode
> > >                                                                  btrfs_log_changed_extents
> > >                                                                   down_write(&BTRFS_I(inode) >dio_sem)
> > >                                                                    Collect new extent maps and ordered extents
> > >                                                                     wait for ordered extent completion
> > >          get_more_blocks (second iteration)
> > >           btrfs_get_blocks_direct
> > >            btrfs_create_dio_extent
> > >              down_read(&BTRFS_I(inode) >dio_sem)
> > >  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > In the above description, Btrfs direct I/O code path has not yet started
> > > submitting bios for file range covered by the initial ordered
> > > extent. Meanwhile, The fast fsync task obtains the write semaphore and
> > > waits for I/O on the ordered extent to get completed. However, the
> > > Direct I/O task is now blocked on obtaining the read semaphore.
> > > 
> > > To resolve the deadlock, this commit modifies the Direct I/O code path
> > > to obtain the read semaphore before invoking
> > > __blockdev_direct_IO(). The semaphore is then given up after
> > > __blockdev_direct_IO() returns. This allows the Direct I/O code to
> > > complete I/O on all the ordered extents it creates.
> > >
> > 
> > Btw, I was able to reproduce the issue on kdave/for-next branch with "Merge
> > branch 'for-next-next-4.9-20161125' into for-next-20161125" as the topmost
> > commit. The issue cannot be reproduced yet on latest code available from
> > kdave/for-next branch.
> > 
> >
> 
> Maybe changes in upstream might have masked the issue in the recent
> kdave/for-next branch. I say that because 'git bisect' resulted in the
> following commit ...

I guess that the for-next branch didn't revert this patch[1] as upstream
did, so that generic/113 would complain, however, even w/o that patch,
this fix is still required since the deadlock could be reproduced by
running generic/113 with '-ofragment=data' and in fact Filipe has
proposed a almost same fix but not a real patch in this thread [2].

[1]: Btrfs: adjust len of writes if following a preallocated extent
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9413129/
[2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9445231/

Thanks,

-liubo

> 
> e3597e6090ddf40904dce6d0a5a404e2c490cac6
> Author:     Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
> AuthorDate: Tue Nov 1 12:54:45 2016 -0700
> Commit:     Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
> CommitDate: Tue Nov 1 12:54:45 2016 -0700
> 
> Parent:     570dd45 btrfs: fix races on root_log_ctx lists
> Parent:     9d1032c btrfs: fix WARNING in btrfs_select_ref_head()
> Merged:     btrfs-next-for-linus-4.8 kdave-master linus-v4.7-rc6 local-v4.7-rc4
> Containing: direct-io-fsync-deadlock kdave-for-next
> Follows:    v4.8-rc8 (57)
> Precedes:   next-20161219 (30006)
> 
> Merge branch 'for-4.9-rc3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.9
> 
> 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |  3 +++
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c   |  8 ++++----
> fs/btrfs/inode.c       | 13 +++++++++----
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c       |  5 +++++
> fs/btrfs/relocation.c  |  9 ++++++++-
> 
> -- 
> chandan
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-24  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-23  9:30 [PATCH] Btrfs: Fix deadlock between direct IO and fast fsync Chandan Rajendra
2016-12-23 10:27 ` Chandan Rajendra
2016-12-23 11:57   ` Chandan Rajendra
2016-12-24  0:18     ` Liu Bo [this message]
2016-12-24  3:27       ` Chandan Rajendra
2017-01-02 14:29       ` David Sterba
2017-01-06 11:45 ` Filipe Manana
2017-01-06 12:18   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161224001800.GA11160@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.