From: Luis Ressel <aranea@aixah.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: mount_pseudo(), sget() and MS_KERNMOUNT
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 11:20:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161227112037.015dc5ac@gentp.lnet> (raw)
Hello,
With Linux 4.8, the sget() function in fs/super.c got a new permission
check: It now returns -EPERM if
(!(flags & MS_KERNMOUNT) && !ns_capable(user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) .
I presume the first half is intented to detect in-kernel mounts? If so,
why doesn't mount_pseudo() (in fs/libfs.c) pass the MS_KERNMOUNT flag
to sget()?
This behaviour has caused a problem for me: During graphics driver
initalization, drm_fs_inode_new() (in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c) calls
simple_pin_fs(). The MS_KERNMOUNT flag is indeed passed down the
call chain from there, but it is lost when mount_pseudo() is called, as
that function doesn't take a 'flags' argument.
Hence, the first part of the above permission check fails. (The second
part also fails under some cicumstances due to a SELinux quirk, and
therefore the initalization of my graphics driver doesn't succeed.)
Regards,
Luis Ressel
(Apologies if I'm sending this inquiry to the wrong people. I don't
know much about the kernel development workflow, so I decided to send
it to whomever get_maintainer.pl spat out, plus the author of the
sget() change in 4.8.)
next reply other threads:[~2016-12-27 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-27 10:20 Luis Ressel [this message]
2017-01-04 4:20 ` mount_pseudo(), sget() and MS_KERNMOUNT Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161227112037.015dc5ac@gentp.lnet \
--to=aranea@aixah.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.