All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tools: test case for TPACKET_V3/TX_RING support
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:02:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170102230242.GC31716@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-JLDM9cekGTz7m3VYXmf4d+HEMX4dYZx=sB1X7+5drqsA@mail.gmail.com>

On (01/02/17 17:31), Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> 
> Thanks for adding this.
> 
> walk_v3_tx is almost identical to walk_v1_v2_tx. That function can
> just be extended to add a v3 case where it already multiplexes between
> v1 and v2.

I looked at that, but the sticky point is that v1/v2 sets up the
ring->rd* related variables based on frames (e.g., rd_num is tp_frame_nr)
whereas V3 sets these up based on blocks (e.g, rd_num is  tp_block_nr) 
so this impacts the core sending loop a bit.

I suppose we could change the walk_v2_v2_tx to be something like
	while (total_packets > 0) {
		if (ring->version) {
		    /* V3 send, that takes above difference into account */
		} else {
		    /* existing code */
		}
		/* status_bar_update(), user_ready  update frame_num */
	}

I can change it as above, if you think this would help.

--Sowmini

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-02 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-01 22:45 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] TPACKET_V3 TX_RING support Sowmini Varadhan
2017-01-01 22:45 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] af_packet: TX_RING support for TPACKET_V3 Sowmini Varadhan
2017-01-02 22:57   ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-01-02 23:07     ` Sowmini Varadhan
2017-01-01 22:45 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tools: test case for TPACKET_V3/TX_RING support Sowmini Varadhan
2017-01-02 22:31   ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-01-02 23:02     ` Sowmini Varadhan [this message]
2017-01-02 23:15       ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170102230242.GC31716@oracle.com \
    --to=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.