From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031602AbdADWHR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2017 17:07:17 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:38148 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761679AbdADWHB (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2017 17:07:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:06:25 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends Message-ID: <20170104150625.5da36137@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20170102152227.9446-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> References: <20170102152227.9446-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc > for QEMU's documentation. Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively > straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes. Patches 3 to 5, instead, > are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with > the input and output of the rST backend. > > I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends; > but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm > trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :) I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll go ahead and apply them. Thanks, jon