From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lothar Wassmann <LW@karo-electronics.de>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] pwm: imx: remove ipg clock and enable per clock when required
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:27:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105092703.41101426@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170105082609.0bd2e884@jawa>
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 08:26:09 +0100
Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 00:36:45 +0100
> > Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > Can you keep Sascha as the author of this patch?
>
> But the patch differs from the original one - and that change was sent
> by you - so I assume that you made the modifications.
>
> Apparently there are two authors and we only have one "Author"
> field :-) so I took the patch as it was sent by you.
Well, when the changes are substantial it can be justified, but here
the changes are trivial (2 lines changed), and I don't think it calls
for an authorship change (unless Sascha doesn't want to take the
responsibility for those 2 lines).
>
> Is the rest of the series correct?
I'll have a look.
>
> Best regards,
> Łukasz Majewski
>
> >
> > >
> > > The use of the ipg clock was introduced with commit 7b27c160c681
> > > ("pwm: i.MX: fix clock lookup").
> > > In the commit message it was claimed that the ipg clock is enabled
> > > for register accesses. This is true for the ->config() callback,
> > > but not for the ->set_enable() callback. Given that the ipg clock
> > > is not consistently enabled for all register accesses we can assume
> > > that either it is not required at all or that the current code does
> > > not work. Remove the ipg clock code for now so that it's no longer
> > > in the way of refactoring the driver.
> > >
> > > In the other hand, the imx7 IP requires the peripheral clock to be
> > > enabled before accessing its registers. Since ->config() can be
> > > called when the PWM is disabled (in which case, the peripheral
> > > clock is also disabled), we need to surround the imx->config() with
> > > clk_prepare_enable(per_clk)/clk_disable_unprepare(per_clk) calls.
> > >
> > > Note that the imx7 IP was working fine so far because the ipg clock
> > > was actually pointing to the peripheral clock, which guaranteed
> > > peripheral clock activation even when ->config() was called when
> > > the PWM was disabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > > Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v4:
> > > - Enable per clk before calling imx->config()
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - New patch
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 12 ++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > > index d600fd5..b1d1e50 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > > @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
> > >
> > > struct imx_chip {
> > > struct clk *clk_per;
> > > - struct clk *clk_ipg;
> > >
> > > void __iomem *mmio_base;
> > >
> > > @@ -206,13 +205,13 @@ static int imx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip
> > > *chip, struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg);
> > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > ret = imx->config(chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns);
> > >
> > > - clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg);
> > > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > @@ -293,13 +292,6 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_per);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - imx->clk_ipg = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ipg");
> > > - if (IS_ERR(imx->clk_ipg)) {
> > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "getting ipg clock failed with
> > > %ld\n",
> > > - PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg));
> > > - return PTR_ERR(imx->clk_ipg);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > imx->chip.ops = &imx_pwm_ops;
> > > imx->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > imx->chip.base = -1;
> >
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lukasz Majewski
>
> --
>
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-05 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-04 23:36 [PATCH v4 00/11] pwm: imx: Provide atomic operation for IMX PWM driver Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] pwm: print error messages with pr_err() instead of pr_debug() Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] pwm: imx: remove ipg clock and enable per clock when required Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-05 7:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-05 7:26 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-05 8:27 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-01-05 8:32 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-10 17:28 ` Stefan Agner
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] pwm: imx: Add separate set of pwm ops for PWMv1 and PWMv2 Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] pwm: imx: Rewrite imx_pwm_*_v1 code to facilitate switch to atomic pwm operation Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] pwm: imx: Move PWMv2 software reset code to a separate function Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] pwm: imx: Move PWMv2 wait for fifo slot " Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for i.MX PWMv2 Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-05 8:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-05 9:03 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-05 9:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-05 9:35 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-05 9:53 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-10 3:14 ` Stefan Agner
2017-01-10 3:14 ` Stefan Agner
2017-01-10 7:59 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-05 21:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-06 7:06 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-01-07 18:35 ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] pwm: imx: Remove redundant i.MX PWMv2 code Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] pwm: core: make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optional Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] pwm: imx: doc: Update imx-pwm.txt documentation entry Lukasz Majewski
2017-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] pwm: imx: Add polarity inversion support to i.MX's PWMv2 Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170105092703.41101426@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=LW@karo-electronics.de \
--cc=bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.