All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:46:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105194604.GA2064@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f450fd45-1cf9-1969-007e-7cd72b614e08@huawei.com>

On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io during
> >> checkpoint.
> >> Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it will be done when actually reusing
> >> them.
> >>
> >> Test on initial partition of nvme drive.
> >>
> >>  # time fstrim /mnt/test
> >>
> >> Before : 6.158s
> >> After : 4.822s
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> > 
> > One comment below,
> 
> I still have a comment on this patch.
> 
> >> -void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >> +/* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
> >> +void f2fs_wait_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct list_head *wait_list = &(SM_I(sbi)->wait_list);
> >>  	struct bio_entry *be, *tmp;
> >> @@ -646,7 +650,15 @@ void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>  		struct bio *bio = be->bio;
> >>  		int err;
> >>  
> >> -		wait_for_completion_io(&be->event);
> >> +		if (!completion_done(&be->event)) {
> >> +			if ((be->start_segno >= segno &&
> >> +					be->end_segno <= segno) ||
> > 
> > segno >= be->start_segno && segno < be->end_segno ?
> 
> Can you check this?

The be->start_segno and be->end_segno are assigned by:

unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkstart);
unsigned int end_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkstart + blklen);

in __f2fs_issue_discard_async().

So, the problem comes when, for example, blkstart = 0 and blklen = 512.

I should have got the end_segno by:

unsigned int end_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkstart + blklen - 1);

Thanks,

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-05 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-30 18:51 [PATCH 01/10] f2fs: reassign new segment for mode=lfs Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 02/10] f2fs: fix wrong tracepoints for op and op_flags Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  3:25   ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04  3:25     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] f2fs: add submit_bio tracepoint Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  3:32   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-04  3:32     ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:35   ` [PATCH 03/10 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:07     ` Chao Yu
2017-01-12 11:07       ` Chao Yu
2017-01-12 11:07       ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 04/10] f2fs: support IO alignment for DATA and NODE writes Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  8:23   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-04  8:23     ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:44     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 23:44       ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:15       ` Chao Yu
2017-01-12 11:15         ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 05/10] f2fs: get io size bit from mount option Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 06/10] f2fs: show the max number of atomic operations Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  8:45   ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04  8:45     ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:50   ` [PATCH 06/10 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:15     ` Chao Yu
2017-01-12 11:15       ` Chao Yu
2017-01-12 11:15       ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 07/10] f2fs: don't allow encrypted operations without keys Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  8:56   ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04  8:56     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  9:29   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-04  9:29     ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05  3:19     ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05  3:19       ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05  8:17       ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05  8:17         ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-05 19:59         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-05 19:59           ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-05 19:46       ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2017-01-06  2:06         ` Chao Yu
2017-01-06  2:06           ` Chao Yu
2017-01-06  2:42           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-06  2:42             ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-06  3:32             ` Chao Yu
2017-01-06  3:32               ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22  7:23             ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22  7:23               ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22  7:23               ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22 21:15               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22 21:15                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23  2:08                 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-23  2:08                   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-02-23  2:42                   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23  2:42                     ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 09/10] f2fs: avoid needless checkpoint in f2fs_trim_fs Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22  7:23   ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22  7:23     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 10/10] f2fs: return fs_trim if there is no candidate Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22  7:23   ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22  7:23     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-02-22 21:26     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22 21:26       ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23  2:12       ` Chao Yu
2017-02-23  2:12         ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-02-23  2:47         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23  2:47           ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04  3:24 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 01/10] f2fs: reassign new segment for mode=lfs Chao Yu
2017-01-04  3:24   ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04 22:48   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:03     ` Chao Yu
2017-01-12 11:03       ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170105194604.GA2064@jaegeuk.local \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.