* [PATCH] appendix/questions: Add missing NBSPs
@ 2017-01-08 16:34 SeongJae Park
2017-01-08 21:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2017-01-08 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck; +Cc: perfbook, SeongJae Park
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
---
appendix/questions/after.tex | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/appendix/questions/after.tex b/appendix/questions/after.tex
index cbba768dd443..e648667614a4 100644
--- a/appendix/questions/after.tex
+++ b/appendix/questions/after.tex
@@ -184,13 +184,13 @@ SMP code?
Simply use SMP primitives as designed.
In this example, the easiest fix is to use locking, for example,
-acquire a lock in the producer before line 10 in
+acquire a lock in the producer before line~10 in
Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Producer Function} and in
the consumer before line~13 in
Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Consumer Function}.
This lock must also be released after line~13 in
Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Producer Function} and
-after line 17 in
+after line~17 in
Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Consumer Function}.
These locks cause the code segments in lines~10-13 of
Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Producer Function} and in lines~13-17 of
--
2.10.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] appendix/questions: Add missing NBSPs
2017-01-08 16:34 [PATCH] appendix/questions: Add missing NBSPs SeongJae Park
@ 2017-01-08 21:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2017-01-08 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SeongJae Park; +Cc: perfbook
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:34:45AM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Queued and pushed, thank you, SeongJae!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> appendix/questions/after.tex | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/appendix/questions/after.tex b/appendix/questions/after.tex
> index cbba768dd443..e648667614a4 100644
> --- a/appendix/questions/after.tex
> +++ b/appendix/questions/after.tex
> @@ -184,13 +184,13 @@ SMP code?
> Simply use SMP primitives as designed.
>
> In this example, the easiest fix is to use locking, for example,
> -acquire a lock in the producer before line 10 in
> +acquire a lock in the producer before line~10 in
> Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Producer Function} and in
> the consumer before line~13 in
> Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Consumer Function}.
> This lock must also be released after line~13 in
> Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Producer Function} and
> -after line 17 in
> +after line~17 in
> Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Consumer Function}.
> These locks cause the code segments in lines~10-13 of
> Figure~\ref{fig:app:questions:After Producer Function} and in lines~13-17 of
> --
> 2.10.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-08 21:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-08 16:34 [PATCH] appendix/questions: Add missing NBSPs SeongJae Park
2017-01-08 21:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.