From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQVre-0007o1-Jk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:03:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQVrb-0004SO-Hb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:03:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQVrb-0004Rg-CK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 04:03:35 -0500 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A788FD10 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:03:29 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20170109090329.GA2541@work-vm> References: <20170106182823.1960-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> <148372870194.199.4494478269203412425@790289a7ca88> <20170106185918.GA32535@work-vm> <20170109005557.GB9148@lemon.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170109005557.GB9148@lemon.Home> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] Postcopy: Hugepage support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, amit.shah@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com * Fam Zheng (famz@redhat.com) wrote: > On Fri, 01/06 18:59, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > * no-reply@patchew.org (no-reply@patchew.org) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Checking PATCH 14/15: postcopy: Check for userfault+hugepage feature... > > > ERROR: trailing whitespace > > > #21: FILE: migration/postcopy-ram.c:85: > > > + bool have_hp = false; $ > > > > I noticed that one but explicitly left it; the code really reads much > > more cleanly to me with it explicitly set. > > It's not complaining about the variable being initialized, but rather the ending > whitespace before EOL. Oops! Yeh that I need to fix. (And read the messages!) Dave > Fam -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK