From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] x86/microcode/intel: Add a helper which gives the microcode revision
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:41:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170109114147.5082-4-bp@alien8.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170109114147.5082-1-bp@alien8.de>
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Since on Intel we're required to do CPUID(1) first, before reading
the microcode revision MSR, let's add a special helper which does the
required steps so that we don't forget to do them next time, when we
want to read the microcode revision.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h | 15 ++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 11 +++------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 43 ++++++++++------------------------
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
index 195becc6f780..e793fc9a9b20 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
@@ -52,6 +52,21 @@ struct extended_sigtable {
#define exttable_size(et) ((et)->count * EXT_SIGNATURE_SIZE + EXT_HEADER_SIZE)
+static inline u32 intel_get_microcode_revision(void)
+{
+ u32 rev, dummy;
+
+ native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0);
+
+ /* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
+ native_cpuid_eax(1);
+
+ /* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
+ native_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, dummy, rev);
+
+ return rev;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL
extern void __init load_ucode_intel_bsp(void);
extern void load_ucode_intel_ap(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 2d49aa949fa1..203f860d2ab3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <asm/bugs.h>
#include <asm/cpu.h>
#include <asm/intel-family.h>
+#include <asm/microcode_intel.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
#include <linux/topology.h>
@@ -78,14 +79,8 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
(c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model >= 0x0e))
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
- if (c->x86 >= 6 && !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64)) {
- unsigned lower_word;
-
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
- /* Required by the SDM */
- native_cpuid_eax(1);
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, lower_word, c->microcode);
- }
+ if (c->x86 >= 6 && !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64))
+ c->microcode = intel_get_microcode_revision();
/*
* Atom erratum AAE44/AAF40/AAG38/AAH41:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index f79249fab389..faec8fa68ffd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -390,15 +390,8 @@ static int collect_cpu_info_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
native_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID, val[0], val[1]);
csig.pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
}
- native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0);
- /* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
- native_cpuid_eax(1);
-
- /* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
- native_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
-
- csig.rev = val[1];
+ csig.rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
uci->cpu_sig = csig;
uci->valid = 1;
@@ -582,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
{
struct microcode_intel *mc;
- unsigned int val[2];
+ u32 rev;
mc = uci->mc;
if (!mc)
@@ -590,21 +583,16 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
- native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0);
- /* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
- native_cpuid_eax(1);
-
- /* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
- native_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
- if (val[1] != mc->hdr.rev)
+ rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
+ if (rev != mc->hdr.rev)
return -1;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
/* Flush global tlb. This is precaution. */
flush_tlb_early();
#endif
- uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
if (early)
print_ucode(uci);
@@ -784,8 +772,8 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
struct microcode_intel *mc;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c;
- unsigned int val[2];
static int prev_rev;
+ u32 rev;
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu))
@@ -802,33 +790,28 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
- wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0);
-
- /* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
- native_cpuid_eax(1);
- /* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
+ rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
- if (val[1] != mc->hdr.rev) {
+ if (rev != mc->hdr.rev) {
pr_err("CPU%d update to revision 0x%x failed\n",
cpu, mc->hdr.rev);
return -1;
}
- if (val[1] != prev_rev) {
+ if (rev != prev_rev) {
pr_info("updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
- val[1],
+ rev,
mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
mc->hdr.date >> 24,
(mc->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
- prev_rev = val[1];
+ prev_rev = rev;
}
c = &cpu_data(cpu);
- uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
- c->microcode = val[1];
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+ c->microcode = rev;
return 0;
}
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-09 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-09 11:41 [PATCH 0/5] x86/microcode: More urgent fixes Borislav Petkov
2017-01-09 11:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/CPU: Add native CPUID variants returning a single datum Borislav Petkov
2017-01-09 22:16 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2017-01-10 0:19 ` hpa
2017-01-10 9:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-10 16:40 ` hpa
2017-01-10 17:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-09 11:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/microcode: Use native CPUID to tickle out microcode revision Borislav Petkov
2017-01-09 22:16 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2017-01-09 11:41 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-01-09 22:17 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/microcode/intel: Add a helper which gives the " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2017-01-09 11:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/microcode/intel: Fix allocation size of struct ucode_patch Borislav Petkov
2017-01-09 11:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/microcode/intel: Use correct buffer size for saving microcode data Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170109114147.5082-4-bp@alien8.de \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.