All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20170109205746.GA6274@lst.de>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 1f24ead..5efbd69 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-On Mon, Jan 09, 2017@11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
+On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
 > I believe the bounce buffering code you refer to is not in SATA/SCSI/MMC
 > but in block layer, in particular it should be controlled by
 > blk_queue_bounce_limit().  [Yes there is CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE but it
@@ -57,3 +57,8 @@ should rely on swiotlb instead.
 > there is no directly-DMAable memory available at allocation time.
 
 For block I/O that is never the case.
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-arm-kernel mailing list
+linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index e548a2c..d2ba6b9 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,12 +3,28 @@
  "ref\09a03c05d-ad4c-0547-d1fe-01edb8b082d6@cogentembedded.com\0"
  "ref\06374144.HVL0QxNJiT@wuerfel\0"
  "ref\0b50e25af-3936-d22d-2e9b-5bf6be19c800@cogentembedded.com\0"
- "From\0hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dma_mapping: allow PCI host driver to limit DMA mask\0"
+ "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dma_mapping: allow PCI host driver to limit DMA mask\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 9 Jan 2017 21:57:46 +0100\0"
+ "To\0Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>"
+  Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
+  Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
+  Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
+  Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
+  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+  linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
+  Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
+  linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
+  Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
+  artemi.ivanov@cogentembedded.com
+  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@linaro.org>
+ " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Mon, Jan 09, 2017@11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:\n"
+ "On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:\n"
  "> I believe the bounce buffering code you refer to is not in SATA/SCSI/MMC\n"
  "> but in block layer, in particular it should be controlled by\n"
  "> blk_queue_bounce_limit().  [Yes there is CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE but it\n"
@@ -66,6 +82,11 @@
  "> cases when no such information is available at allocation time, or when\n"
  "> there is no directly-DMAable memory available at allocation time.\n"
  "\n"
- For block I/O that is never the case.
+ "For block I/O that is never the case.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
-850d2cd7fb5d6e4cd0895db8bd420c5003bfb56d8e5cf3a8dd0e9ebbaeace6e8
+ea7cf08e5373a5bebf0048855876361dc81b28c60b23d18c8bdf2b5cdfa4d302

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 1f24ead..3252509 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-On Mon, Jan 09, 2017@11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
+On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
 > I believe the bounce buffering code you refer to is not in SATA/SCSI/MMC
 > but in block layer, in particular it should be controlled by
 > blk_queue_bounce_limit().  [Yes there is CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE but it
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index e548a2c..e9a10cc 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -3,12 +3,28 @@
  "ref\09a03c05d-ad4c-0547-d1fe-01edb8b082d6@cogentembedded.com\0"
  "ref\06374144.HVL0QxNJiT@wuerfel\0"
  "ref\0b50e25af-3936-d22d-2e9b-5bf6be19c800@cogentembedded.com\0"
- "From\0hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dma_mapping: allow PCI host driver to limit DMA mask\0"
+ "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dma_mapping: allow PCI host driver to limit DMA mask\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 9 Jan 2017 21:57:46 +0100\0"
+ "To\0Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd@linaro.org>"
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+  Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
+  Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
+  Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
+  linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
+  Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
+  artemi.ivanov@cogentembedded.com
+  Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
+  Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
+  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+  Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
+ " linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Mon, Jan 09, 2017@11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:\n"
+ "On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:\n"
  "> I believe the bounce buffering code you refer to is not in SATA/SCSI/MMC\n"
  "> but in block layer, in particular it should be controlled by\n"
  "> blk_queue_bounce_limit().  [Yes there is CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE but it\n"
@@ -68,4 +84,4 @@
  "\n"
  For block I/O that is never the case.
 
-850d2cd7fb5d6e4cd0895db8bd420c5003bfb56d8e5cf3a8dd0e9ebbaeace6e8
+97bdf99646f32507962c619d293cda30741f30e464b7ab50abac9c0759a5aacf

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index 1f24ead..3252509 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-On Mon, Jan 09, 2017@11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
+On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
 > I believe the bounce buffering code you refer to is not in SATA/SCSI/MMC
 > but in block layer, in particular it should be controlled by
 > blk_queue_bounce_limit().  [Yes there is CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE but it
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index e548a2c..b985f61 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -6,9 +6,10 @@
  "From\0hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)\0"
  "Subject\0[PATCH 1/2] arm64: dma_mapping: allow PCI host driver to limit DMA mask\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 9 Jan 2017 21:57:46 +0100\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Mon, Jan 09, 2017@11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:\n"
+ "On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:34:55PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:\n"
  "> I believe the bounce buffering code you refer to is not in SATA/SCSI/MMC\n"
  "> but in block layer, in particular it should be controlled by\n"
  "> blk_queue_bounce_limit().  [Yes there is CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE but it\n"
@@ -68,4 +69,4 @@
  "\n"
  For block I/O that is never the case.
 
-850d2cd7fb5d6e4cd0895db8bd420c5003bfb56d8e5cf3a8dd0e9ebbaeace6e8
+c2c1ef1b03e8bc21dbb7303607b97f7a57d9d44c6c78f061f75524a829451a70

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.