From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQlKZ-00023U-97 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:34:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQlKU-000614-Dn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:34:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQlKU-00060C-83 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:34:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 09:34:20 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20170110013420.GA2033@lemon> References: <1481922841-4324-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <148192392306.37.10111381964118487672@790289a7ca88> <20170109184252-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.9 0/9] virtio, vhost, pc: fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , QEMU Developers , Stefan Hajnoczi On Mon, 01/09 17:28, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 January 2017 at 16:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > The strange thing here is that this actually seems to apply patches > > from list instead of getting the tag from the tree. > > That's because it's really supposed to be working on patches sent > to the list -- it only checks pull requests because it can't > tell them apart from patches, I think. It can be taught not to check pull requests but I don't see a reason to, maybe it's better to let patchew pull the tag instead of applying, but on the other hand it's a bit odd to assume they two differ, that's why I haven't done it. Fam