All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Subject: [RFC 5/6] perf/core: rotation no longer necessary. Behavior has changed. Beware
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 02:25:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170110102502.106187-6-davidcc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170110102502.106187-1-davidcc@google.com>

The sched in/out process updates timestamps and "rotates"
ctx->inactive_groups.

This changes the speed at which rotation happens. Before events will
rotate one event per interruption, now they will rotate q events each
timer interruption. Where q is the number of events added to the pmu per
sched in.

Signed-off-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 22 +++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index c7715b2627a9..f5d9c13b485f 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3642,19 +3642,6 @@ static void perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 	raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
 }
 
-/*
- * Round-robin a context's events:
- */
-static void rotate_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
-{
-	/*
-	 * Rotate the first entry last of non-pinned groups. Rotation might be
-	 * disabled by the inheritance code.
-	 */
-	if (!ctx->rotate_disable)
-		list_rotate_left(&ctx->flexible_groups);
-}
-
 static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
 {
 	struct perf_event_context *ctx = NULL;
@@ -3681,10 +3668,11 @@ static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
 	if (ctx)
 		ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
 
-	rotate_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx);
-	if (ctx)
-		rotate_ctx(ctx);
-
+	/*
+	 * A sched out will insert event groups at end of inactive_groups,
+	 * a sched in will schedule events at the beginning of inactive_groups.
+	 * This causes a rotation.
+	 */
 	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, ctx, current);
 
 	perf_pmu_enable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
-- 
2.11.0.390.gc69c2f50cf-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-10 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-10 10:24 [RFC 0/6] optimize ctx switch with rb-tree David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-10 10:24 ` [RFC 1/6] perf/core: create active and inactive event groups David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-10 13:49   ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-10 20:45     ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-12 11:05       ` Mark Rutland
     [not found]         ` <CALcN6mhPmpSqKhE3Ua+j-xROLzeAyrgdCk4AGGtfF9kExXRTJg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-01-13 11:01           ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-10 10:24 ` [RFC 2/6] perf/core: add a rb-tree index to inactive_groups David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-10 14:14   ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-10 20:20     ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-12 11:47       ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-13  7:34         ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-16  2:03   ` [lkp-developer] [perf/core] 33da94bd89: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel kernel test robot
2017-01-16  2:03     ` kernel test robot
2017-01-10 10:24 ` [RFC 3/6] perf/core: use rb-tree to sched in event groups David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-10 16:38   ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-10 20:51     ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-12 12:14       ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-13  8:01         ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-13 10:24           ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-11 20:31     ` Liang, Kan
2017-01-12 10:11       ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-12 13:28         ` Liang, Kan
2017-01-13  8:05           ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-10 10:25 ` [RFC 4/6] perf/core: avoid rb-tree traversal when no inactive events David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-10 10:25 ` David Carrillo-Cisneros [this message]
2017-01-10 10:25 ` [RFC 6/6] perf/core: use rb-tree index to optimize filtered perf_iterate_ctx David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-16  2:05   ` [lkp-developer] [perf/core] 49c04ee1a7: WARNING:at_kernel/events/core.c:#perf_iterate_ctx_matching kernel test robot
2017-01-16  2:05     ` kernel test robot
2017-04-25 17:27 ` [RFC 0/6] optimize ctx switch with rb-tree Liang, Kan
2017-04-25 17:49   ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-04-25 18:11     ` Budankov, Alexey
2017-04-25 18:54       ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-04-26 10:34         ` Budankov, Alexey
2017-04-26 19:40           ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-04-26 10:52         ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170110102502.106187-6-davidcc@google.com \
    --to=davidcc@google.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.