From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cR26E-0002x9-Mi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:28:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cR26A-0003Ql-JN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:28:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cR26A-0003QA-AJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:28:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:28:44 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20170110212744-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1478772703-28185-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <1478772703-28185-7-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <20170110053133-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <362c2ee4-b230-d407-c3eb-af80fbfafa96@redhat.com> <148406606920.24341.4122999103047828613@loki> <6d6c6198-10e1-f5a3-e436-f92e306e6833@redhat.com> <148406927879.24341.8983562873840557521@loki> <20170110194258-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <148407224651.24341.3951013177607226062@loki> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <148407224651.24341.3951013177607226062@loki> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Remove obsolete stable branches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Roth Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:17:26PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote: > Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin (2017-01-10 11:43:24) > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:27:58AM -0600, Michael Roth wrote: > > > Quoting Paolo Bonzini (2017-01-10 10:45:02) > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/01/2017 17:34, Michael Roth wrote: > > > > > Quoting Thomas Huth (2017-01-10 01:54:40) > > > > >> On 10.01.2017 04:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > >>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11:43AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > > > > >>>> There are only very old and orphaned stable branches listed > > > > >>>> in the MAINTAINERS file - so this section is pretty useless > > > > >>>> nowadays. Let's remove it. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Reviewed-by: John Snow > > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Could you add some kind of entry for stable though? > > > > >>> Otherwise people won't know which address to CC. > > > > >> > > > > >> I think that's a question to Michael Roth - whether such an entry should > > > > >> be added and how it should look like. > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, not sure how to make this very readable. Something like this > > > > > perhaps? > > > > > > > > > > Stable branches > > > > > --------------- > > > > > Current M.(N-1) Stable Branch (e.g. v2.8 if latest M.N.0 release was v2.9.0) > > > > > M: Michael Roth > > > > > L: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > > > > T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu.git stable-M.(N-1) > > > > > S: Supported > > > > > > > > I would just say > > > > > > > > Stable branches > > > > --------------- > > > > Current Stable Branch (e.g. v2.8 if latest M.N.0 release was v2.9.0) > > > > M: Michael Roth > > > > L: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > > > S: Supported > > > > > > > > Is the stable git tree used in practice, except in the days right before > > > > a release? > > > > > > Generally not on my end, but it's possible downstreams make use of them > > > as a means to just grab the latest stable release (though I don't know if > > > this is actually the case or not). I agree that having it in MAINTAINERS > > > isprobably of limited usefulness though. > > > > > > I *would* like to have a fairly consistent tree that's updated more regularly > > > that people could target for backports and such, but that would probably > > > be via my stable-N.M-staging tree on github. Perhaps I should point > > > people there instead? Unfortunately that still requires some amount of > > > variable substitution. > > > > Do you need multiple trees? Why not have branches? > > Sorry, by "tree" I meant branch, e.g.: > > https://github.com/mdroth/qemu/tree/stable-2.7-staging > https://github.com/mdroth/qemu/tree/stable-2.6-staging I would say T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu.git stable-M.(N-1) conveys that clearly. > etc. Or were you suggesting something else? > > I don't think I can do something like a single stable-current-staging > branch since there's often some overlap between stable releases for N > and N-1 cycles, and the N branches aren't direct descendants of N-1 > (not sure if that's what you were suggesting). > > > > > > > > > > > Paolo > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> Thomas > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>>> --- > > > > >>>> MAINTAINERS | 22 ---------------------- > > > > >>>> 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-) > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > > >>>> index d8575ab..4a60579 100644 > > > > >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > > >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > > >>>> @@ -1574,28 +1574,6 @@ F: tcg/tci/ > > > > >>>> F: tci.c > > > > >>>> F: disas/tci.c > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> -Stable branches > > > > >>>> ---------------- > > > > >>>> -Stable 1.0 > > > > >>>> -L: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > > > >>>> -T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu-stable-1.0.git > > > > >>>> -S: Orphan > > > > >>>> - > > > > >>>> -Stable 0.15 > > > > >>>> -L: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > > > >>>> -T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu-stable-0.15.git > > > > >>>> -S: Orphan > > > > >>>> - > > > > >>>> -Stable 0.14 > > > > >>>> -L: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > > > >>>> -T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu-stable-0.14.git > > > > >>>> -S: Orphan > > > > >>>> - > > > > >>>> -Stable 0.10 > > > > >>>> -L: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > > > >>>> -T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu-stable-0.10.git > > > > >>>> -S: Orphan > > > > >>>> - > > > > >>>> Block drivers > > > > >>>> ------------- > > > > >>>> VMDK > > > > >>>> -- > > > > >>>> 1.8.3.1 > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >