Re: [RFC v2] Xen PV Drivers Lifecycle

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:49:15AM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:00:01AM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > as you know, we have an issue with the speed of review and acceptance of
> > > > new PV drivers. In a discussion among committers, George wrote an email
> > > > with a short proposal to clarify the development lifecycle of new PV
> > > > drivers and the different expectations at each stage of the process. I
> > > > took that email, polished it and turned it into markdown. Here it is.
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > > Acks:
> > > > +1 from Wei Liu
> > > 
> > > +1.
> > > 
> > > Albeit I am concerned about the 
> > > ..
> > > > from one stage to the next within a reasonable time frame unless someone
> > > 
> > > .. of what 'reasonable time' is when somebody is on vacation
> > > or sick.
> > > 
> > > Is it worth spelling that out?
> > 
> > I don't think we should introduce hard time limits, but it should be in
> > terms of few months, not years.
> 
> We have only had positive feedback so far and two explicit +1's. Should
> we call "lazy-consensus" and commit it?

Yes!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel