diff for duplicates of <20170112130752.GA14465@lst.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 408b94e..360610e 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -On Thu, Jan 12, 2017@12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: +On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > That is an interesting question: We actually have the > "DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING" for this case, and ARM implements > it in the coherent interface, so that might be a good fit. @@ -16,3 +16,8 @@ Though about that - but in the end DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING implies those, so instead of using lots of flags in driver I'd rather fix up more dma_ops implementations to take advantage of DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING. + +_______________________________________________ +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 1edcf80..d13208a 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,12 +2,28 @@ "ref\020170110144839.GB27156@lst.de\0" "ref\080676b35-121b-0462-23fc-ed5608e1e671@grimberg.me\0" "ref\03306663.hKmLLq1hhl@wuerfel\0" - "From\0hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)\0" - "Subject\0NVMe vs DMA addressing limitations\0" + "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" + "Subject\0Re: NVMe vs DMA addressing limitations\0" "Date\0Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:07:52 +0100\0" + "To\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd@linaro.org>\0" + "Cc\0Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>" + Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> + Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> + Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> + Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> + Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org + linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org + Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> + linux-pci@vger.kernel.org + Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> + artemi.ivanov@cogentembedded.com + Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> + " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Thu, Jan 12, 2017@12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" + "On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" "> That is an interesting question: We actually have the\n" "> \"DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING\" for this case, and ARM implements\n" "> it in the coherent interface, so that might be a good fit.\n" @@ -24,6 +40,11 @@ "Though about that - but in the end DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING implies\n" "those, so instead of using lots of flags in driver I'd rather fix\n" "up more dma_ops implementations to take advantage of\n" - DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING. + "DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING.\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -81fa2b5576b40b1fee32c9937e79967268d329c05f0bd5a01bd444f5c3a807a8 +8f93fd652f30c081fe0b90d3161a5fbee9c389aa949e2d8efded2022a67456a6
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 408b94e..f966d7b 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -On Thu, Jan 12, 2017@12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: +On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > That is an interesting question: We actually have the > "DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING" for this case, and ARM implements > it in the coherent interface, so that might be a good fit. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 1edcf80..1b28c8f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -2,12 +2,28 @@ "ref\020170110144839.GB27156@lst.de\0" "ref\080676b35-121b-0462-23fc-ed5608e1e671@grimberg.me\0" "ref\03306663.hKmLLq1hhl@wuerfel\0" - "From\0hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)\0" - "Subject\0NVMe vs DMA addressing limitations\0" + "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" + "Subject\0Re: NVMe vs DMA addressing limitations\0" "Date\0Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:07:52 +0100\0" + "To\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd@linaro.org>\0" + "Cc\0Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>" + Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> + Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> + Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org + Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> + linux-pci@vger.kernel.org + Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> + artemi.ivanov@cogentembedded.com + Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> + Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> + " linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Thu, Jan 12, 2017@12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" + "On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" "> That is an interesting question: We actually have the\n" "> \"DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING\" for this case, and ARM implements\n" "> it in the coherent interface, so that might be a good fit.\n" @@ -26,4 +42,4 @@ "up more dma_ops implementations to take advantage of\n" DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING. -81fa2b5576b40b1fee32c9937e79967268d329c05f0bd5a01bd444f5c3a807a8 +7172e7aa08c302236cbf3ce7e09d0e93c6ed2a332f0baf3f5649b346ffb797e9
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index 408b94e..f966d7b 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -On Thu, Jan 12, 2017@12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: +On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > That is an interesting question: We actually have the > "DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING" for this case, and ARM implements > it in the coherent interface, so that might be a good fit. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index 1edcf80..0a133f8 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -5,9 +5,10 @@ "From\0hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)\0" "Subject\0NVMe vs DMA addressing limitations\0" "Date\0Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:07:52 +0100\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Thu, Jan 12, 2017@12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" + "On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" "> That is an interesting question: We actually have the\n" "> \"DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING\" for this case, and ARM implements\n" "> it in the coherent interface, so that might be a good fit.\n" @@ -26,4 +27,4 @@ "up more dma_ops implementations to take advantage of\n" DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING. -81fa2b5576b40b1fee32c9937e79967268d329c05f0bd5a01bd444f5c3a807a8 +1218df4af902f3c3385e6aacdc0995d94db3fb7e27408c3be69afaeefed4b7f4
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.