From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8DD60807 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id j13so19691028iod.3 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 06:44:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=2TmrHZte+kyan9VNVmMMxc6XmCwj27EyzJbCRNr7xS4=; b=ej6RcbdJfO40gdyv3F4vH3lQzZI0bTz0e7SoQv5isS5YpKNlC+28cQviXoehUl1NpW fH+vRKWuWV0Fsx2eU4kqc8dte5uJE+PdqOOPQqXod7dU7c7/I0+/EWVNdE/u9mAxuXnp Ca6GVEomtGtzYnYWCMGorJvatxmcm9kjHawdjL/dr0GqnjBmlJMmGRwRnUYAEKfGcAaf 2AykOjJ+NNbDBqCDlJnAaSkPg37MFZ8jFYljM15bseTGUMK2WGCBC4qsqhTf/5IgysbJ /l2x0CAslO5GNWdQ+YRR/KThURsUDS5mW4b7tmXMQpgf+A3pJLb2qXGGtZQZ3+vLnZPC DpmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=2TmrHZte+kyan9VNVmMMxc6XmCwj27EyzJbCRNr7xS4=; b=OO+zgi1kak0CkLmUv/ZpbQcijx08xCAnmcHeIPyfh7nQHK2q2uIzCxhcJoEGqJh5tf 3JsSvaR+h/SJx5ZMUKOgNnRrM7F96bLf0vvm+96P1wlE9L33mGCv/CXw0eNQvmmc5V9x CQD/b5Jr+58r1e6TXYZQ3QtpIo5QRsQGYJyZhlfDM7gSkybO6Oy6F4W0wkCoISU7JV/N fWtOPlBY61faZomfuaviNtexz+vkr4uqUJyLR8C8sBudj/3caDSGwzKIOwx2CZVJt7mg spdWSJIL83vaRhCVEpUKRSKIQwDBR4VcCg5f5aE3xalXAP3Y9PVot5d39nHICouDpJva YElg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKdhc79ZnR4XCNRKPYJxEn/IaLwug2xFK7o3Jg5rdm4lYIkamb1FoTflvyhSKZt6w== X-Received: by 10.107.179.215 with SMTP id c206mr12749201iof.35.1484232256584; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 06:44:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux-uys3 (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a18sm1147665itd.18.2017.01.12.06.44.15 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 06:44:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:44:14 -0500 From: Trevor Woerner To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20170112144413.GA7854@linux-uys3> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Subject: meta-browser duplicate patch X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:44:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Does the do_patch logic now ignore the same patch being applied twice? I was quite sure this was a problem in the past (and if it isn't, maybe it should be?) In commit fb4e542079958b6afde324a1e9bfdd695842aeeb the patch recipes-browser/chromium/chromium/chromium/Do-not-depend-on-Linux-4.5.patch and in commit c6fc9da7be64af7cd08c2bbb026e4c3ffc760687 the patch recipes-browser/chromium/chromium/chromium/unset-madv-free.patch are exactly the same. Yet they're both happily applied without so much as a warning, not even in temp/log.do_patch.