From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: bootx_init.c:88: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail_local'
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:07:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112180713.GU28613@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484234447.2492.34.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:20:47AM -0600, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 15:42 +0100, Christophe LEROY wrote:
> > The 4.6.3 uses __stack_chk_guard, while the 4.4.4 and 4.8.3 use
> > -28680(r2)
> >
> > Is it dependent on the way GCC is built ? Then do we have a way to
> > know,
> > when we compile, which method GCC will use ?
> >
> > See details below for each of the 3 GCC versions.
>
> I think it depends if you built it along with glibc (so it can produce
> userspace binaries) or not.
Right. Tony's compilers are built using a (modified version of) buildall,
and buildall goes out of its way to build without libc whatsoever, even
if the configuration (powerpc64-linux, for example) expects one.
Which leads to TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP being undefined (it would normally
be true for glibc >= 2.4), and that is all. Mystery solved. Thanks!
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-03 15:25 bootx_init.c:88: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail_local' Christian Kujau
2017-01-03 19:20 ` Christian Kujau
2017-01-03 22:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-03 22:57 ` Christian Kujau
2017-01-04 8:23 ` Christophe LEROY
2017-01-04 8:40 ` Segher Boessenkool
2017-01-04 7:32 ` Christophe LEROY
2017-01-04 15:22 ` Christian Kujau
2017-01-04 18:33 ` Christian Kujau
2017-01-10 2:11 ` Christian Kujau
2017-01-10 4:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-10 6:12 ` Christophe LEROY
2017-01-10 18:46 ` Christian Kujau
2017-01-10 6:26 ` Christophe LEROY
2017-01-11 22:54 ` Segher Boessenkool
2017-01-12 7:52 ` Christophe LEROY
2017-01-12 14:42 ` Christophe LEROY
2017-01-12 15:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-01-12 18:07 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2017-01-13 12:15 ` Christophe LEROY
2017-01-13 12:23 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112180713.GU28613@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.