From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Felipe Franciosi <felipe@nutanix.com>
Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" <mlureau@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Marc-Andre Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] libvhost-user: Start VQs on SET_VRING_CALL
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 19:04:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170113190029-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF473AD9-3343-4C5F-8DE1-B0870DC65327@nutanix.com>
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:09:46PM +0000, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> Hi Marc-Andre,
>
> > On 13 Jan 2017, at 07:03, Marc-André Lureau <mlureau@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Currently, VQs are started as soon as a SET_VRING_KICK is received. That
> >> is too early in the VQ setup process, as the backend might not yet have
> >
> > I think we may want to reconsider queue_set_started(), move it elsewhere, since kick/call fds aren't mandatory to process the rings.
>
> Hmm. The fds aren't mandatory, but I imagine in that case we should still receive SET_VRING_KICK/CALL messages without an fd (ie. with the VHOST_MSG_VQ_NOFD_MASK flag set). Wouldn't that be the case?
Please look at docs/specs/vhost-user.txt, Starting and stopping rings
The spec says:
Client must start ring upon receiving a kick (that is, detecting that
file descriptor is readable) on the descriptor specified by
VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_KICK, and stop ring upon receiving
VHOST_USER_GET_VRING_BASE.
> >
> >> a callfd to notify in case it received a kick and fully processed the
> >> request/command. This patch only starts a VQ when a SET_VRING_CALL is
> >> received.
> >
> > I don't like that much, as soon as the kick fd is received, it should start polling it imho. callfd is optional, it may have one and not the other.
>
> So the question is whether we should be receiving a SET_VRING_CALL anyway or not, regardless of an fd being sent. (I think we do, but I haven't done extensive testing with other device types.)
I would say not, only KICK is mandatory and that is also not enough
to process ring. You must wait for it to be readable.
> >
> > Perhaps it's best for now to delay the callfd notification with a flag until it is received?
>
> The other idea is to always kick when we receive the callfd. I remember discussing that alternative with you before libvhost-user went in. The protocol says both the driver and the backend must handle spurious kicks. This approach also fixes the bug.
>
> I'm happy with whatever alternative you want, as long it makes libvhost-user usable for storage devices.
>
> Thanks,
> Felipe
>
>
> >
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi <felipe@nutanix.com>
> >> ---
> >> contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
> >> b/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
> >> index af4faad..a46ef90 100644
> >> --- a/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
> >> +++ b/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
> >> @@ -607,19 +607,6 @@ vu_set_vring_kick_exec(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
> >> DPRINT("Got kick_fd: %d for vq: %d\n", vmsg->fds[0], index);
> >> }
> >>
> >> - dev->vq[index].started = true;
> >> - if (dev->iface->queue_set_started) {
> >> - dev->iface->queue_set_started(dev, index, true);
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - if (dev->vq[index].kick_fd != -1 && dev->vq[index].handler) {
> >> - dev->set_watch(dev, dev->vq[index].kick_fd, VU_WATCH_IN,
> >> - vu_kick_cb, (void *)(long)index);
> >> -
> >> - DPRINT("Waiting for kicks on fd: %d for vq: %d\n",
> >> - dev->vq[index].kick_fd, index);
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -661,6 +648,19 @@ vu_set_vring_call_exec(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg)
> >>
> >> DPRINT("Got call_fd: %d for vq: %d\n", vmsg->fds[0], index);
> >>
> >> + dev->vq[index].started = true;
> >> + if (dev->iface->queue_set_started) {
> >> + dev->iface->queue_set_started(dev, index, true);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (dev->vq[index].kick_fd != -1 && dev->vq[index].handler) {
> >> + dev->set_watch(dev, dev->vq[index].kick_fd, VU_WATCH_IN,
> >> + vu_kick_cb, (void *)(long)index);
> >> +
> >> + DPRINT("Waiting for kicks on fd: %d for vq: %d\n",
> >> + dev->vq[index].kick_fd, index);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.9.4
> >>
> >>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-13 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-13 1:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] libvhost-user: Start VQs on SET_VRING_CALL Felipe Franciosi
2017-01-13 15:03 ` Marc-André Lureau
2017-01-13 15:09 ` Felipe Franciosi
2017-01-13 17:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-01-13 17:15 ` Felipe Franciosi
2017-01-13 18:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-13 22:29 ` Felipe Franciosi
2017-01-17 18:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-17 18:53 ` Felipe Franciosi
2017-01-17 19:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-19 10:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-16 18:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-16 18:27 ` Felipe Franciosi
2017-01-17 18:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170113190029-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mlureau@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.