Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] Introduce a sysctl that modifies the value of PROT_SOCK.

[Krister Johansen <kjlx@templeofstupid.com>]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 06:39:57AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 22:52 -0800, Krister Johansen wrote:
> > Add net.ipv4.ip_unprotected_port_start, which is a per namespace sysctl
> > that denotes the first unprotected inet port in the namespace.  To
> > disable all protected ports set this to zero.  It also checks for
> > overlap with the local port range.  The protected and local range may
> > not overlap.
> > 
> > The use case for this change is to allow containerized processes to bind
> > to priviliged ports, but prevent them from ever being allowed to modify
> > their container's network configuration.  The latter is accomplished by
> > ensuring that the network namespace is not a child of the user
> > namespace.  This modification was needed to allow the container manager
> > to disable a namespace's priviliged port restrictions without exposing
> > control of the network namespace to processes in the user namespace.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@templeofstupid.com>
> > ---
> >  include/net/ip.h               | 10 +++++++++
> >  include/net/netns/ipv4.h       |  1 +
> >  net/ipv4/af_inet.c             |  5 ++++-
> >  net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c     | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  net/ipv6/af_inet6.c            |  3 ++-
> >  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c |  7 +++---
> >  net/sctp/socket.c              | 10 +++++----
> >  security/selinux/hooks.c       |  3 ++-
> 
> Adding a new sysctl without documentation is generally not accepted.
> 
> Please take a look at Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt

Thanks for catching this.  I'll add an entry to the documentation.

> BTW, sticking to 'unprivileged' ports might be better than 'unprotected'
> which is vague.

I don't have a strong preference about the naming.  I'd be happy to
change it to 'unprivileged' instead.

-K