All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: 4.10-rc1: thinkpad x60: who ate my cpu?
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 10:56:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170115095656.GA16524@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170114113054.GA22012@amd>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1335 bytes --]

On Sat 2017-01-14 12:30:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Thu 2017-01-12 20:19:31, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> > Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >Hi!
> > >
> > >>I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
> > >>only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
> > >>suspend/resume cycles. When backups finish, I'll try -rc2.
> > >Whoever did it, he seems to have returned the cpu in -rc3. All seems
> > >to be good now.
> 
> > Actually since you have mentioned - I have checked my x60 - same problem -
> > only one CPU. However I was running 4.8.13 with uptime 33 days, multiple
> > sleep/wake-ups.
> > Installed a current EOL 4.8.17 and rebooted - I see 2 CPUs. So the issue is
> > older then 4.10 kernel, and I suspect it is the CPU hotplug / wakeup
> > related...
> 
> Hmm. So I seen two cores in -rc3 after boot. But it is quite well
> possible that -rc1 was ok just after boot, too, and problem happened
> sometime later (probably during suspend/resume cycles). Let me go back
> to -rc1 to check.

Indeed in -rc1 I see both CPUs after boot. So we have hard to
reproduce case where 4.8 to 4.10 kernels lose one of the cpu cores...



-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-15  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-08 22:17 4.10-rc1: thinkpad x60: who ate my cpu? Pavel Machek
2017-01-09  9:30 ` Pavel Machek
2017-01-13  1:19   ` Woody Suwalski
2017-01-14 11:30     ` Pavel Machek
2017-01-15  9:56       ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2017-02-11 23:48         ` Woody Suwalski
2017-02-12 15:43           ` Woody Suwalski
2017-02-12 19:57             ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-13  1:35               ` Woody Suwalski
2017-02-13  8:02                 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-13  8:48                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-13  9:42                     ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-13 10:18                       ` lkml
2017-02-13 11:25                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-13 11:39                           ` lkml
2017-02-13 11:40                           ` lkml
2017-02-13 11:53                         ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170115095656.GA16524@amd \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=terraluna977@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.