From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:48:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60596 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23991346AbdAONsmfAv8F (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:48:42 +0100 Received: from localhost (unknown [78.192.101.3]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06536723; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 13:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:48:48 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: James Hogan , Ralf Baechle , Matt Redfearn , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Thomas Gleixner , Paolo Bonzini , Marcin Nowakowski , Chris Metcalf , Petr Mladek , LKML , Adam Buchbinder , Paul Burton , Jiri Slaby , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Aaron Tomlin , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] MIPS: Add per-cpu IRQ stack Message-ID: <20170115134848.GA27658@kroah.com> References: <1482157260-18730-1-git-send-email-matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> <20170111012032.GE31072@linux-mips.org> <20170113094939.GI10569@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 56312 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 02:39:49PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi James, > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:49 AM, James Hogan wrote: > > Its quite a significant change/feature, especially in terms of potential > > for further breakage. I don't think its really stable material to be > > honest. It sounds bad if the kernel stack requirement can be made > > arbitrarily large by stacking too many drivers. > > Indeed I believe this is the case. If, say, a kthread is already using > a bit of stack, and then a softirq chain of stacked virtual network > drivers is called, the stack can be busted. > > > Is there a simpler fix/workaround for the issue that would satisfy > > stable kernel users until they can upgrade to a kernel with irqstacks? > > The simplest solution is probably just not stacking tons of network > drivers. For my own out-of-tree curve25519-donna code that's in > OpenWRT and uses a fair amount of stack, I just kmalloc on MIPS but > not on x86, so in terms of my own stuff there's already a workaround > in place. But this still doesn't solve things for users who have some > interesting networking requirements and stack a few drivers. > > Unfortunately, most folks are only testing stuff on ARM and x86, which > already have the separate IRQ stacks, so they aren't hitting crashes. > > So, in the end, I'm not quite sure. On the one hand, this fixes an > actual problem and it'd be nice to see stable kernels have the fix. On > the other hand, this is a rather big change. I don't know how to > assess it, but I've copied Greg on this email, who certainly has > better judgement about this than me. How many patches is the irqstacks "feature" for MIPS? What kernel was it released in? Have any git commit ids I can look at? thanks, greg k-h