From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 855B8E008D7; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:12:30 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.223.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.223.175 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37302E00839 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id j18so103257370ioe.2 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:12:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ip0XF+o+6UtXyCdh6N9a8vX+0IS2Ia8Yvj1OxILb+yA=; b=TCvKnNF/UOm67tkpPjbuvlMFKDsPEp3Whq6QwYnp+d5tRG/zqq6OazhTDPTOc7HkTd A5jkU4PN5DqSGLM9th9ueiED94WWbMnnQBruq4RfbhLJqyMPBU99ShMhyGrPa9MrkZ5S F1jrOU6r6c6brrgnScr6amhwUGxmDotx4JSVDeI3m6w1mUjNLVrfzSgfwCPzQ8GeuI2x 27cgXfo7faSXOHgSy/cKppMaCzp/+ke8/a6+pINV6W8UcWM2Q5bXslOBAWcjyst+lvk+ M0DxzKAejxjzkAH2HG3KFlIWExOuQbMuLJRckaHF6tm1VobCTA6C0QBpjeBz1XHAYfm8 anjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ip0XF+o+6UtXyCdh6N9a8vX+0IS2Ia8Yvj1OxILb+yA=; b=HDzNzmhbZzeJ6ICvOdYSwVIaukTsZf258wOOm74jLYNyUXyRP1dwng9fvgEXXBf6wh dqdeQI3nijeu4nGXuVtbXfXZODo2FyFf7mprurlFocvhcNkcucKf9jQKWo/dTiqamgZ4 /q6ZeQIg/wiskWAoZbwQWnzGjLqJkP7e8X+nf1VnlOKxLVimKqWbqPLTgcKLCpnb8+sx 5fBsXjwJBnXLzy2lQTsmrHCJq9PIDTppCsJ84yXSiCAyNVC9N26372F4jP8dB+QQU90a UbGL4Oy0t6ruYoZbgNmm46gnYMQsf4UHMSa17lxkOb2QxqVS491fKtH1u3eh5lYObCl8 QF0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL71iS5apmYiqax49adueWDLh+2+pg6R+L9regteNPoWSMxZ0GB1X5Urael5YRL3A== X-Received: by 10.107.17.101 with SMTP id z98mr41123524ioi.226.1484611948209; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux-uys3 (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u203sm1539867itb.10.2017.01.16.16.12.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:12:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:12:15 -0500 From: Trevor Woerner To: Paul Barker Message-ID: <20170117001215.GA12017@linux-uys3> References: <20170105174229.1648-1-twoerner@gmail.com> <20170105193338.5b1360ec@nuc.betafive.co.uk> <20170105201619.GA7568@openSUSE-i7.site> <20170105215916.072b9215@nuc.betafive.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170105215916.072b9215@nuc.betafive.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v2] linux-raspberrypi-rt: add X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:12:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hi Paul, On Thu 2017-01-05 @ 09:59:16 PM, Paul Barker wrote: > Also, are you thinking of moving the -rt recipe to the 4.9 series when > upstream linux-raspberrypi declares that stable? I just want to confirm that 4.9 is going to be the next stable series? How do we know 4.8 isn't going to be the next stable after 4.4?