From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:12:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117001237.GU5238@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170116192537.etuzs7lvo2h7il6g@x>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:25:38AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 03:34:20AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:47:35PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:54:42AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > > > @@ -693,7 +752,7 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(long long oldval, bool user)
> > > > {
> > > > struct rcu_state *rsp;
> > > > struct rcu_data *rdp;
> > > > - struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> > > > + struct rcu_dynticks __maybe_unused *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> > >
> > > Rather than marking a local variable as __maybe_unused (such that the
> > > compiler can no longer help detect it as unused), could you move it into
> > > the portion of the function that uses it, so that if reached, it'll
> > > always get used?
> > >
> > > > trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("Start"), oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
> >
> > Its only use is in the above event trace, which can be disabled via
> > CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=n. I could put the definition of rdtp under #ifdef,
> > but this seems ugly. I could eliminate the variable, substituting
> > the initialization for rdtp in the event trace, but that would make
> > for a very long line, or an odd line break.
>
> For the trace_rcu_dyntick calls, you could create a small static inline
> helper to do the tracing, eliminating the third argument. Or you could
> create a helper that returns
> this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks)->dynticks_nesting. Either way would work.
>
> Or, if you prefer, you could wrap the variable
> declaration/initialization in RCU_TRACE() rather than adding
> __maybe_unused.
RCU_TRACE() it is in both cases, thank you! (You would think I would
remember the code that I wrote...)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-14 8:54 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 7:39 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 11:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 18:57 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 23:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 7:47 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 11:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 19:25 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-17 0:12 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-01-16 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-16 21:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-17 0:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 7:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Josh Triplett
2017-01-18 2:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-21 20:49 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-23 19:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170117001237.GU5238@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.