From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Victor Julien <lists@inliniac.net>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailing list <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tcp state in conntrack destroy events
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:28:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117212807.GC12001@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fdd3eb50-75d3-32e1-d7a0-f333050aece5@inliniac.net>
Victor Julien <lists@inliniac.net> wrote:
> I was hoping to get the last TCP state in a conntrack destroy event,
> however it seems to be unavailable.
>
> Through libnetfilter_conntrack the value retrieved at ATTR_TCP_STATE is
> always 0.
>
> Using the conntrack command I see the same behavior:
>
> destroy doesn't have it (conntrack -E -e destroy -p tcp):
>
> [DESTROY] tcp 6 src=218.65.30.38 dst=192.168.178.254 sport=61063
> dport=22 packets=11 bytes=820 src=192.168.0.123 dst=218.65.30.38
> sport=22 dport=61063 packets=8 bytes=424 [ASSURED] mark=3 delta-time=77
>
> update does (conntrack -E -e updates -p tcp):
>
> [UPDATE] tcp 6 120 FIN_WAIT src=192.168.0.53 dst=x.x.x.x
> sport=52958 dport=443 src=x.x.x.x dst=192.168.178.254 sport=443
> dport=52958 [ASSURED] mark=3
>
> Is this intentional? My goal is to create connection log that includes a
> hint about why the connection is gone.
Yes, its intentional, see
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c, there is a check for DESTROY
that supresses most of the extra info:
682 if (events & (1 << IPCT_DESTROY)) {
683 if (ctnetlink_dump_acct(skb, ct, type) < 0 ||
684 ctnetlink_dump_timestamp(skb, ct) < 0)
685 goto nla_put_failure;
686 } else {
..
/* IPCT_PROTOINFO */
Pablo made this change in 7b621c1ea64a54f77b8a841b16dc4c9fee3ecf48,
i guess the rationale was that clients aren't interested in this
on DESTROY.
Would be easy to change this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-17 19:46 tcp state in conntrack destroy events Victor Julien
2017-01-17 21:28 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-01-17 21:39 ` Victor Julien
2017-01-17 23:23 ` Jarno Rajahalme
2017-01-17 23:47 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170117212807.GC12001@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=lists@inliniac.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.