From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTiiD-0006pY-UZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:23:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTii8-0003Th-Vb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:23:09 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:44818 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTii8-0003Tb-PM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:23:04 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v0I5Khbh015505 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:23:03 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.149]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 281xc2ejay-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:23:03 -0500 Received: from localhost by e31.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:23:02 -0700 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:22:56 +0800 From: Dong Jia Shi References: <20170112072513.98411-1-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170112072513.98411-9-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170117154934.568c6ea3@t450s.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170117154934.568c6ea3@t450s.home> Message-Id: <20170118052256.GP30301@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 08/12] vfio/ccw: get io region info List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Williamson Cc: Dong Jia Shi , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, renxiaof@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, wkywang@linux.vnet.ibm.com * Alex Williamson [2017-01-17 15:49:34 -0700]: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:25:09 +0100 > Dong Jia Shi wrote: > > > vfio-ccw provides an MMIO region for I/O operations. We fetch its > > information via ioctls here, then we can use it performing I/O > > instructions and retrieving I/O results later on. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Feng Ren > > --- > > hw/vfio/ccw.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c > > index 881010b..93394c2 100644 > > --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c > > +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c > > @@ -21,11 +21,15 @@ > > #include "hw/vfio/vfio-common.h" > > #include "hw/s390x/s390-ccw.h" > > #include "hw/s390x/ccw-device.h" > > +#include "standard-headers/asm-s390/vfio_ccw.h" > > > > #define TYPE_VFIO_CCW "vfio-ccw" > > typedef struct VFIOCCWDevice { > > S390CCWDevice cdev; > > VFIODevice vdev; > > + uint64_t io_region_size; > > + uint64_t io_region_offset; > > + struct ccw_io_region *io_region; > > } VFIOCCWDevice; > > > > static void vfio_ccw_compute_needs_reset(VFIODevice *vdev) > > @@ -50,6 +54,46 @@ static void vfio_ccw_reset(DeviceState *dev) > > ioctl(vcdev->vdev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET); > > } > > > > +static void vfio_ccw_get_region(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev, Error **errp) > > +{ > > + VFIODevice *vdev = &vcdev->vdev; > > + struct vfio_region_info *info; > > + int ret; > > + > > + /* Sanity check device */ > > + if (!(vdev->flags & VFIO_DEVICE_FLAGS_CCW)) { > > + error_setg(errp, "vfio: Um, this isn't a vfio-ccw device"); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (vdev->num_regions != VFIO_CCW_NUM_REGIONS) { > > + error_setg(errp, "vfio: Unexpected number of the I/O region %u", > > + vdev->num_regions); > > + return; > > + } > > I think you want < here, not !=, otherwise you we can never add another > region to describe something new on a vfio-ccw device without breaking > this code. You've defined in the uapi that region index zero is always > VFIO_CCW_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX and this code only depends on that, no > matter what additional regions might be added. That's done below. > Right! Thanks for pointing out. I will fix. > > + > > + ret = vfio_get_region_info(vdev, VFIO_CCW_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX, &info); > > + if (ret) { > > + error_setg(errp, "vfio: Error getting config info: %d", ret); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + vcdev->io_region_size = info->size; > > + if (sizeof(*vcdev->io_region) != vcdev->io_region_size) { > > + error_setg(errp, "vfio: Unexpected size of the I/O region"); > > + return; > > + } > > + vcdev->io_region_offset = info->offset; > > + vcdev->io_region = g_malloc0(info->size); > > + > > + g_free(info); > > +} > > + > > +static void vfio_ccw_put_region(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev) > > +{ > > + g_free(vcdev->io_region); > > +} > > + > > static void vfio_put_device(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev) > > { > > g_free(vcdev->vdev.name); > > @@ -144,8 +188,15 @@ static void vfio_ccw_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > > goto out_device_err; > > } > > > > + vfio_ccw_get_region(vcdev, errp); > > + if (*errp) { > > + goto out_region_err; > > + } > > + > > return; > > > > +out_region_err: > > + vfio_put_device(vcdev); > > out_device_err: > > vfio_ccw_put_group(group, path); > > out_group_err: > > @@ -166,6 +217,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_unrealize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > > cdc->unrealize(cdev, errp); > > } > > > > + vfio_ccw_put_region(vcdev); > > vfio_put_device(vcdev); > > vfio_put_group(group); > > } > -- Dong Jia