From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] NAPI polling for block drivers
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:58:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170118145816.GI3514@linux-x5ow.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3438024-e0f2-db96-5122-4508863be603@grimberg.me>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> >So what you say is you saw a consomed == 1 [1] most of the time?
> >
> >[1] from http://git.infradead.org/nvme.git/commitdiff/eed5a9d925c59e43980047059fde29e3aa0b7836
>
> Exactly. By processing 1 completion per interrupt it makes perfect sense
> why this performs poorly, it's not worth paying the soft-irq schedule
> for only a single completion.
>
> What I'm curious is how consistent is this with different devices (wish
> I had some...)
Hannes just spotted this:
static int nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
const struct blk_mq_queue_data *bd)
{
[...]
__nvme_submit_cmd(nvmeq, &cmnd);
nvme_process_cq(nvmeq);
spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
out_cleanup_iod:
nvme_free_iod(dev, req);
out_free_cmd:
nvme_cleanup_cmd(req);
return ret;
}
So we're draining the CQ on submit. This of cause makes polling for
completions in the IRQ handler rather pointless as we already did in the
submission path.
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N�rnberg
GF: Felix Imend�rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N�rnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jthumshirn@suse.de (Johannes Thumshirn)
Subject: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] NAPI polling for block drivers
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:58:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170118145816.GI3514@linux-x5ow.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3438024-e0f2-db96-5122-4508863be603@grimberg.me>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017@04:27:24PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> >So what you say is you saw a consomed == 1 [1] most of the time?
> >
> >[1] from http://git.infradead.org/nvme.git/commitdiff/eed5a9d925c59e43980047059fde29e3aa0b7836
>
> Exactly. By processing 1 completion per interrupt it makes perfect sense
> why this performs poorly, it's not worth paying the soft-irq schedule
> for only a single completion.
>
> What I'm curious is how consistent is this with different devices (wish
> I had some...)
Hannes just spotted this:
static int nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
const struct blk_mq_queue_data *bd)
{
[...]
__nvme_submit_cmd(nvmeq, &cmnd);
nvme_process_cq(nvmeq);
spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
out_cleanup_iod:
nvme_free_iod(dev, req);
out_free_cmd:
nvme_cleanup_cmd(req);
return ret;
}
So we're draining the CQ on submit. This of cause makes polling for
completions in the IRQ handler rather pointless as we already did in the
submission path.
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn at suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] NAPI polling for block drivers
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:58:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170118145816.GI3514@linux-x5ow.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3438024-e0f2-db96-5122-4508863be603@grimberg.me>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> >So what you say is you saw a consomed == 1 [1] most of the time?
> >
> >[1] from http://git.infradead.org/nvme.git/commitdiff/eed5a9d925c59e43980047059fde29e3aa0b7836
>
> Exactly. By processing 1 completion per interrupt it makes perfect sense
> why this performs poorly, it's not worth paying the soft-irq schedule
> for only a single completion.
>
> What I'm curious is how consistent is this with different devices (wish
> I had some...)
Hannes just spotted this:
static int nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
const struct blk_mq_queue_data *bd)
{
[...]
__nvme_submit_cmd(nvmeq, &cmnd);
nvme_process_cq(nvmeq);
spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
out_cleanup_iod:
nvme_free_iod(dev, req);
out_free_cmd:
nvme_cleanup_cmd(req);
return ret;
}
So we're draining the CQ on submit. This of cause makes polling for
completions in the IRQ handler rather pointless as we already did in the
submission path.
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-18 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 13:43 [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] NAPI polling for block drivers Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 13:43 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 13:43 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 13:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 13:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 13:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 15:07 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-11 15:07 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-11 15:13 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-11 15:13 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-12 8:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 8:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 10:02 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 10:02 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 10:02 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 11:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 11:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 12:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 12:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 12:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 14:41 ` [Lsf-pc] " Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 14:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 18:59 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 18:59 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 18:59 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 15:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 15:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 15:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 15:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-20 12:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-20 12:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-20 12:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 16:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 16:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 16:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 16:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 16:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 16:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 16:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 13:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 13:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 13:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 14:27 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 14:27 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 14:36 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-18 14:36 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-18 14:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 14:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 15:35 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-18 15:35 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-18 14:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2017-01-18 14:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 14:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 15:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 15:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 15:16 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 15:16 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 15:16 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 15:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-18 15:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-18 15:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-19 8:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-19 8:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-19 8:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-19 8:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-19 9:18 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-19 9:18 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-19 9:18 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-19 9:13 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-19 9:13 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-19 9:13 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 16:44 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-17 16:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 16:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 14:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-18 14:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-20 0:13 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-20 0:13 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-13 15:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-13 15:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-13 15:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 15:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 15:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 15:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-12 4:36 ` Stephen Bates
2017-01-12 4:44 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-12 4:44 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-12 4:56 ` Stephen Bates
2017-01-12 4:56 ` Stephen Bates
2017-01-19 10:57 ` Ming Lei
2017-01-19 10:57 ` Ming Lei
2017-01-19 11:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-19 11:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:12 ` hch
2017-01-11 16:12 ` hch
2017-01-11 16:15 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-11 16:15 ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-11 16:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-12 8:52 ` sagi grimberg
2017-01-12 8:52 ` sagi grimberg
2017-01-11 16:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 16:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 16:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 8:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 8:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 8:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 19:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-12 19:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-12 19:13 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170118145816.GI3514@linux-x5ow.site \
--to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.