Re: [PATCH] lib: sort: make it explicitly non-modular

[Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>]

[Re: [PATCH] lib: sort: make it explicitly non-modular] On 18/01/2017 (Wed 20:03) Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> > The Makefile currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> >
> >      lib/Kconfig.debug:config TEST_SORT
> >      lib/Kconfig.debug:      bool "Array-based sort test"
> >
> > and...
> >
> >      lib/Makefile:obj-y += bcd.o div64.o sort.o [...]
> >
> > ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
> 
> Perhaps allow it to be a module?

If anything, I'd argue the other way and say we shouldn't be further
polluting Kconfig space with more super specific options.  Instead
something more generic like CONFIG_ENABLE_BOOT_SELF_TESTS that at least
could be shared.

There is no real value in making something a module when it could just
as easily be thrown out as __init code/data.

> 
> Besides that perhaps rename to something like test_sort.c ?

The sort.c was not added just for the test code ; it already existed for
the sort code itself.

Paul.
--



> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko