From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50113) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVcE3-0005V2-CM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 05:51:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVcDz-0003Xp-PR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 05:51:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:51:37 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20170123105137.GA28257@lemon.Home> References: <20161216052040.53067-1-haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161216052040.53067-2-haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <7428bd3f-0cc8-f42f-a2bd-442c2c6ffbef@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170116052600.GA16076@lemon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170116052600.GA16076@lemon> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/1] block/vmdk: Fix the endian problem of buf_len and lba List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: liujing , kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, "cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com QingFeng Hao" On Mon, 01/16 13:26, Fam Zheng wrote: > On Mon, 01/16 10:38, liujing wrote: > > Dears, > > > > We would like to know if this patch will be pulled > > > > into upstream or what else we need to do for it? > > > > Because for upstream, the qemu-iotests case 055 still failed. > > Kevin, would you like to take this or should I do it? Adding Max since he's taking care of the other VMDK fix I posted. Fam