From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: Jingju Hou <houjingj@marvell.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and .get_wol
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:58:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170123105816.3400334b@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485139388-11003-1-git-send-email-houjingj@marvell.com>
Hi Jingju,
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:43:08 +0800 wrote:
> The mvneta itself does not support WOL, but the PHY might.
> So pass the calls to the PHY
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou <houjingj@marvell.com>
> ---
> Since v1:
> - using phy_dev member in struct net_device
I noticed that you send a new v2 patch. So this patch should be ignored.
Some tips:
*the v2 patch title should be like:
[PATCH v2] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and .get_wol
*you also add a commit msg in v2, you'd better mention it
in changes since v1.
Thanks,
Jisheng
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index e05e227..78869fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -3908,6 +3908,25 @@ static int mvneta_ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device *dev, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void
> +mvneta_ethtool_get_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> +{
> + wol->supported = 0;
> + wol->wolopts = 0;
> +
> + if (dev->phy_dev)
> + return phy_ethtool_get_wol(dev->phy_dev, wol);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +mvneta_ethtool_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> +{
> + if (!dev->phy_dev)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return phy_ethtool_set_wol(dev->phy_dev, wol);
> +}
> +
> static const struct net_device_ops mvneta_netdev_ops = {
> .ndo_open = mvneta_open,
> .ndo_stop = mvneta_stop,
> @@ -3937,6 +3956,8 @@ static int mvneta_ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device *dev, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
> .set_rxfh = mvneta_ethtool_set_rxfh,
> .get_link_ksettings = phy_ethtool_get_link_ksettings,
> .set_link_ksettings = mvneta_ethtool_set_link_ksettings,
> + .get_wol = mvneta_ethtool_get_wol,
> + .set_wol = mvneta_ethtool_set_wol,
> };
>
> /* Initialize hw */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-23 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 2:43 [PATCH] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and .get_wol Jingju Hou
2017-01-23 2:58 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-22 10:06 Jingju Hou
2017-01-22 11:13 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-22 11:21 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-22 16:49 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170123105816.3400334b@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=houjingj@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.