From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd: always scan VPD pages if thin provisioning is enabled
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:23:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170125102329.GA17657@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485329165-64825-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:26:05AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> For any device with an older SCSI revision we might not
> be scanning VPD pages, which results in a wrongly configured
> discard mode if thin provisioned is enabled.
> According to sbc3 any thin provisioned device (ie devices which
> have the LBPME bit set in the output of READ CAPACITY(16)) need
> to support VPD pages. So this patch always enables VPD pages
> even for older SCSI revisions if thin provisioning is enabled.
Can you explain what you need this for? A device with a per-SBC3
revision that wants us to use UNMAP?
> + /*
> + * sbc3r36 states:
> + * The device server in a logical unit the supports
> + * logical block provisioning management shall support
> + * the Logical Block Provisioning VPD page.
> + * So VPD pages should be supported if lbpme is set.
> + */
It's a bit odd to quote SBC3 when the device clearly is pre-SBC3
to need this workaround..
> + if (!scsi_device_supports_vpd(sdp))
> + sdp->try_vpd_pages = 1;
Do the assignment unconditionally?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-25 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-25 7:26 [PATCH] sd: always scan VPD pages if thin provisioning is enabled Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-25 7:57 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-25 10:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-01-25 10:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-25 14:27 ` Ewan D. Milne
2017-01-25 14:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-25 15:38 ` James Bottomley
2017-01-25 16:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-26 2:45 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170125102329.GA17657@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.