From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/8] arm/arm64: vgic: Implement API for vGICv3 live migration Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:27:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20170127102721.GA10506@cbox> References: <1485440453-10597-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <20170126202640.GD15850@cbox> <9fea1713-7087-7052-5ca6-d9257a6f973a@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D0D4092C for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:27:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-plqS4Zw++K for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:27:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-lf0-f46.google.com (mail-lf0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 022D540430 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:27:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf0-f46.google.com with SMTP id x1so72948798lff.0 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:27:24 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9fea1713-7087-7052-5ca6-d9257a6f973a@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Vijaya Kumar K , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:45:06AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 26/01/17 20:26, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > Hi Vijaya, > > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:50:45PM +0530, vijay.kilari@gmail.com wrote: > >> From: Vijaya Kumar K > >> > >> This patchset adds API for saving and restoring > >> of VGICv3 registers to support live migration with new vgic feature. > >> This API definition is as per version of VGICv3 specification > >> Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic-v3.txt > >> > >> The patch 3 & 4 are picked from the Pavel's previous implementation. > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg122040.html > >> > >> NOTE: Only compilation tested for AArch32. No hardware available to test. > > > > Thanks for the respin. I've given this a once-over and tested on GICv2 > > against migrations and on GICv3 for this functionality, and it looks haha, just noticed this. That's against *regressions* obviously. > > good. > > > > It would be good to see a soon respin of the QEMU series as well. > > > > Marc, unless others have objections to this series, I think we can queue > > this series. > > Yup, I'll queue it on top. Thanks everyone for sticking with this series. > Thanks, -Christoffer From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:27:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v11 0/8] arm/arm64: vgic: Implement API for vGICv3 live migration In-Reply-To: <9fea1713-7087-7052-5ca6-d9257a6f973a@arm.com> References: <1485440453-10597-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <20170126202640.GD15850@cbox> <9fea1713-7087-7052-5ca6-d9257a6f973a@arm.com> Message-ID: <20170127102721.GA10506@cbox> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:45:06AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 26/01/17 20:26, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > Hi Vijaya, > > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:50:45PM +0530, vijay.kilari at gmail.com wrote: > >> From: Vijaya Kumar K > >> > >> This patchset adds API for saving and restoring > >> of VGICv3 registers to support live migration with new vgic feature. > >> This API definition is as per version of VGICv3 specification > >> Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic-v3.txt > >> > >> The patch 3 & 4 are picked from the Pavel's previous implementation. > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg122040.html > >> > >> NOTE: Only compilation tested for AArch32. No hardware available to test. > > > > Thanks for the respin. I've given this a once-over and tested on GICv2 > > against migrations and on GICv3 for this functionality, and it looks haha, just noticed this. That's against *regressions* obviously. > > good. > > > > It would be good to see a soon respin of the QEMU series as well. > > > > Marc, unless others have objections to this series, I think we can queue > > this series. > > Yup, I'll queue it on top. Thanks everyone for sticking with this series. > Thanks, -Christoffer