All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20170128082513.GB4728@lst.de>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index d3c975c..4912dae 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 06:39:46PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
-> Why have the scsi_release_buffers() and scsi_put_command(cmd) calls been
+> Why�have the�scsi_release_buffers() and scsi_put_command(cmd) calls been
 > moved up? I haven't found an explanation for this change in the patch
 > description.
 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 4429cb8..a11164a 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,21 +2,21 @@
  "ref\01485365126-23210-16-git-send-email-hch@lst.de\0"
  "ref\01485542367.4267.19.camel@sandisk.com\0"
  "From\0hch@lst.de <hch@lst.de>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 15/18] scsi: allocate scsi_cmnd structures as part of\tstruct request\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 15/18] scsi: allocate scsi_cmnd structures as part of struct request\0"
  "Date\0Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:25:13 +0100\0"
  "To\0Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-raid@vger.kernel.org <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>"
-  snitzer@redhat.com <snitzer@redhat.com>
-  linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
+ "Cc\0hch@lst.de <hch@lst.de>"
   axboe@fb.com <axboe@fb.com>
+  linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
+  linux-raid@vger.kernel.org <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
   dm-devel@redhat.com <dm-devel@redhat.com>
   linux-block@vger.kernel.org <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
-  j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
- " hch@lst.de <hch@lst.de>\0"
+  snitzer@redhat.com <snitzer@redhat.com>
+ " j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 06:39:46PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:\n"
- "> Why\302\240have the\302\240scsi_release_buffers() and scsi_put_command(cmd) calls been\n"
+ "> Why\303\257\302\277\302\275have the\303\257\302\277\302\275scsi_release_buffers() and scsi_put_command(cmd) calls been\n"
  "> moved up? I haven't found an explanation for this change in the patch\n"
  "> description.\n"
  "\n"
@@ -41,4 +41,4 @@
  "We could have done that.  But it's just more change for a code path\n"
  that I hope won't survive this calendar year.
 
-6460827b0cb9be38d9898c763cf64d9835c4450e21391e542d197661f79ae5c0
+1aa9b134b8a60a987b47ba50bdc8a196917e4c47ba419fcdc6cb68cbf0e7b9ca

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.