From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:35435 "EHLO mail-pg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751426AbdBAIbp (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2017 03:31:45 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 194so107465302pgd.2 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:31:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 00:31:15 -0800 From: Omar Sandoval To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] block: fix blk-mq debugfs vs. blktrace Message-ID: <20170201083115.GA16278@vader> References: <20170201081608.GB18278@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170201081608.GB18278@kroah.com> Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:53:16PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > From: Omar Sandoval > > > > When I moved the blk-mq debugging information to debugfs, I didn't > > realize that blktrace also created directories in debugfs that > > conflicted with the blk-mq directories. This series fixes that. > > > > Patch 1 adds a new debugfs helper needed for patch 6. Greg, could I get > > an ack on that if it makes sense? Jens and I went back and forth on this > > for a little while, but patch 6 has more of the rationale on why we > > decided that this approach was the cleanest. > > I can't find patch 6, you only cc:ed me on the first patch :( > > Care to bounce them all to me? > > thanks, > > greg k-h Gah, I forgot --cc-cover to git-send-email. The series is all here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-block&r=1&b=201701&w=2. I can also send the patches directly to you if you prefer that.